anarchiddy

joined 4 months ago
[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Well that wouldn't make any sense at all - blowback isn't a description of something you wanted to have happen that you didn't expect, it's a description of something you didn't want to happen that you didn't expect

Like the militant extremists you supported fracturing into new adversarial militants that fuck your shit up later.

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

Are we taking about the same comment here? Where did I contradict you?

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 hours ago (5 children)

I can't say for sure but I think you've mistaken me for someone else.

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 hours ago (7 children)

I wonder if there's a term for these kind of 'unintended' consequences to reckless foreign subterfuge

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

A simple toggle, secured with a password would do it.

Yea, that's the thing - I don't think it would 'do' it for legislators. Like you mentioned - it's not really about protecting children, but also the only way to enforce a law like this would be to log or register devices to specific people or children. This would essentially just shift the point of verification from the individual website to the point of sale of the phone or tablet. Verifying the age is the part that necessitates identification - the only thing a hardware-locked strategy does is centralizes that verification to a governing body instead of individual websites, but it still associates individuals with specific devices.

I get why this might seem preferable, but the problem of online privacy still persists.

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago

I'm so tired of this civility meta.

Lemmy is half as uncivilized as any other social media space I've ever been in, including reddit or Twitter. I think people are just confused by a lack of centralized authority to settle disputes on what is or isn't 'civil' behavior - but it certainly isn't the case that it's any less civil than just about any alternative.

Maybe this places extra stress on instance admins for constantly addressing complaints of users on and off their server, but that has less to do with the kind of user civility people are talking about and more with a culture of mob justice evidenced by communities like MoG and PTB.

People seem uncomfortable with multipolar systems, and maybe it's because of my political bent but I think distributed systems are way better.

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I don't think this is a good idea...

This is even more invasive - it would mean all the traffic and activity in every device would be traceable to a registration. Whereas now they might have a pretty good lock on individual device ids, they'd then have an actual registry of devices and owners to verify it against

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

K but who gets the fatwa? The doctor?

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 4 days ago

echoed quite a bit of what I’ve been saying about .ml, the Triad, general toxicity of their Tankie “ideology” for months now.

Sorry, how is his post at all about the 'triad'?

Frankly, I think it's the constant attempts at instigating flame wars that I find to be so grating, not the users with opinions I find distasteful. I have no idea what ptz's specific experience was like, but seeing a prominent anti-tanky crusader project their personal vendetta onto this announcement is the kind of shit I find myself constantly rolling my eyes at.

Federated social media is built to facilitate community between people of different preferences, and it's exactly this constant crusading that's likely to extinguish it. You think you're on a mission of purification but it looks more like you're extinguishing what little enthusiasm there was for lemmy to begin with. Defederation is absolutely a tool for moderation, but making it your entire mission to push for it in every space you participate in is itself a suffocating cancer.

Let people decide for themselves what instances they want to commune with and stop pestering the entire platform into reflecting your personal tastes.

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Yes, and they are not required to run in a primary because those are run by each party (being independent means you don't have a party to begin with)

There's no limit (AFAIK) to the number of candidates on the ballot, but there is a deadline to file and that deadline has passed. Cuomo had preemptively filed as an independent candidate in case he didn't win the primary (I think Mamdani did this too), but had not publicly stated whether he would use it until now.

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

The very first comment:

Unless you believe in magic, the human brain proves that human level general intelligence is possible in our physical universe, running on a system based on the laws of said physical universe. Given that, there's no particular reason to think that "what the brain does" OR a reasonably close approximation, can't be done on another "system based on the laws of our physical universe."

 

Driving the news: On Wednesday, many Democratic lawmakers and officials either denounced Mamdani or notably declined to rally around him. Republicans — including President Trump — crowed about Democrats embracing a democratic socialist who has called for reduced police funding and sided with Palestinians in the Gaza war.

  • The top two Democratic leaders in Congress, Sen. Chuck Schumer and Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, both New Yorkers, declined to endorse Mamdani even as they applauded his victory.

  • New York Rep. Laura Gillen, from Nassau County, called Mamdani the "absolute wrong choice for New York."

  • Rep. Tom Suozzi, also from Nassau County, said he had "serious concerns."

Major Democratic donors — who poured tens of millions into a Super PAC for Cuomo — were having private discussions Wednesday about whether to back an independent run by Cuomo in November's general election, or rally behind unpopular incumbent Mayor Eric Adams, who's also running as an independent.

1
Rocket Man - Jesse Welles (www.youtube.com)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/music@lemmy.world
 

I heard the altar call of the rocket man

as he pleaded on the mount

then were we like those who dream

as the tired tiger jumped through hoops of fire

one last time for the crowd

then were we like those who dream

I saw containerships of man's demise

ride tidal waves to hell

then were we like those who dream

and the whales that did swim by they did not blink

or wish us well

then were we like those who dreamed

all the stones that

broke yer bones won't

maim the soul inside you

time's jus a thing you live through baby

all the things that

make me sing are

jus songs I'm relearning

there's nothing here I'm earning

and on the 8th day man made a machine

likened to his image

then were we like those who dream

and he argued whether or whether not

it would kill and eat his village then were they like those who dream

all the stones that

broke yer bones won't

maim the soul within you time's just a thing you live through baby

all the things that

make me sing are

just songs I'm relearning

there's nothing here I'm earning

I saw the ministers of relevant humanity

trade cards

then were they like those who dream

and I looked into that valley and I knew it would be hard

then were we like those who dream

all the stones that

broke yer bones won't

maim the soul within you

time's just a thing you live through baby

all the things that

make me sing are

just songs I'm relearning

there's nothing here worth earning

view more: next ›