aral

@mc @otter @ozoned @selfhosted 💕

@Iapar@feddit.org Oh, the irony.

@Deebster@programming.dev Uh-huh. Yep. Sure. Let’s give them every benefit of the doubt.

@Randomgal@lemmy.ca I bet you’re great fun at parties.

@Deebster@programming.dev Oh, I don’t know… I wonder why…

https://www.mozilla.ai/

@maniajack@mastodon.world Mozilla is a not-for-profit that owns a half-a-billion dollar a year for-profit that gets its half-a-billion dollars a year from Google.

Or, as their head of public policy once told me: “Why are you being so hard on us? We’re just another Silicon Valley tech company.”

🤷‍♂️

@messaroundmarx@zirk.us 🤷‍♂️

At least they’re open source so you should be able to see exactly what information is being collected if you dive into the code.

@wonkothesane@mstdn.social * A not-for-profit that owns a half-a-billion dollar a year for-profit that gets its half-a-billion dollars a year from Google.

@Hache@masto.es @Waterfox@mastodon.social No, they can’t dictate terms of use for forks without violating their own open source license.

@Bro666 @kde@floss.social @kde@lemmy.kde.social Which would make perfect sense if I had said “Plasma forces you to use Firefox.” Would you like any other straw men to rile against?

@Aaron @kde@floss.social @kde@lemmy.kde.social Yes, to non-private defaults. Let’s put it this way: if Firefox’s defaults respected your privacy, Mozilla would go bankrupt tomorrow.

@dajix @kde@floss.social @kde@lemmy.kde.social It’s deceptive. They know exactly what they’re doing. That’s why they also ask if you haven’t used your browser for a while.