arty

joined 1 year ago
[–] arty@feddit.org 1 points 6 days ago

Dann sehe ich es als positive Entwicklung

[–] arty@feddit.org 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

After the rule name you can add a free text explaining the reasons

/* eslint-disable-next-line specific-rule-name Causes infinite loop */
[–] arty@feddit.org 1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Ist es besser als Axe?

[–] arty@feddit.org 3 points 6 days ago (5 children)

I guess they still haven’t shipped a better way?

/* eslint-disable-next-line specific-rule-name */

Only for multiline comment delimiters

[–] arty@feddit.org 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I’m not a native English speaker, but neither people nor other robots have problems understanding me - in person or over a microphone. Speech Note hadn’t shown good results, unfortunately. I really wanted to use it, because on my Android phone I use voice input all the time.

[–] arty@feddit.org 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

For Framework, they just need to release a screen. They did that for 13, and you can just replace it.

[–] arty@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

Your words made me look again into the documentation:

If your APT configuration mentions additional sources besides bookworm, or if you have installed packages from other releases or from third parties, then to ensure a reliable upgrade process you may wish to begin by removing these complicating factors.

I hadn’t realized that "removing these complicating factors" meant removing these packages, not just disabling their repositories. The wording is terribly vague.

Now I don’t say anything against your experience and the conclusions it has led you to.

But my experience was that only repositories were automatically disabled and packages stayed in their place. The upgrades went through smoothly, things did not break. Were I forced to uninstall these packages and look for their replacements afterwards, I’d be quite annoyed. Maybe not as much as you, when you were forced to reinstall the system.

I’ll conclude for myself that both paths can lead to happy outcomes as well as to poor outcomes. Thank you for sharing!

[–] arty@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Well, people do not follow instructions and their systems get broken 🤷 To a much larger extent than an orphaned package

[–] arty@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I had smooth sailing with Ubuntu for many years, but I don't judge other people's choices

[–] arty@feddit.org 4 points 1 month ago

Wow, what a catch! I should really pay more attention to people… Okay, this person having a really terrible upgrade would perfectly explain what I’m seeing.

Here’s a gold star for winning this topic 🌟

[–] arty@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Is this worse than an upgrade which breaks the system?

[–] arty@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What do you think of the observation that Linux@lemmy.ml had a surprising amount of reports of bungled upgrades?

28
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by arty@feddit.org to c/linux@lemmy.ml
 

So a new major version of Debian has been released, and now I see a lot of complaints about various issues stemming from an upgrade. I do not remember this many after an LTS Ubuntu version. I don't want to rush to conclusions like "Ubuntu has money for better quality assurance". I can easily come up with explanations for why these statistics can be skewed, like "Ubuntu-loving plebeians do not come to complain to elite Lemmy users about their puny problems". I'm curious what you think?

view more: next ›