balance8873

joined 1 week ago

Ah but they aren't his resources

[–] balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

All of these problems are caused by a remarkably small network of people. I'm not even necessarily talking about the CEOs. It's the boards of directors. This is also the pool from which CEOs are drawn one and the pool to which CEOs return after their golden parachute. They function as a living repository of evil. A warehouse of criminals and nepo-babies. (Ex: Airbnb guy joined DOGE and is on teslas board. So first he destroys the housing market for a generation, and then destroys the government, and he is the person who directs Tesla.)

Like, the network is so small it could fit in one big room.

[–] balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Yes but data center growth prior to AI was manageable. There isn't a grid on the planet (except maybe china?) which can support the growth of AI data centers.

These people have to plan energy needs on a 10-20 year life cycle, not 2. It's the 2 that's the problem.

[–] balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

But I don't feel like I'm losing, here we are several days in and I'm clearly winning.

[–] balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one 0 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Ah, yes, there are also the terminally dumb and uneducated. But those people are just weaponized votes. They don't appear to have their own thoughts or agency, just mindless drones following whatever their one podcast or one cable network or their one YouTube guy tells them to do.

But no, there's also plenty of videos of random magas in various formats, and a driving factor for those people appears to be hate (with a healthy mix of not understanding the concept of cause and effect)

[–] balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Sure in other threads on the post but nobody is down here anymore. We're all alone in this nested comment hell.

[–] balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm going to downvote you but only because you didn't even glance at the article.

The pictured approach is clearly one in which the safety markings remain visible and contrast sufficiently with the bright rainbow colors.

Something someone did in Iceland isn't relevant. Maybe in their culture it's considered polite to mow down pedestrians, there's no way to know.

If that's the takeaway you want rather than "standard business practice is to vet organizations you support to make sure your goals are aligned"...uh...good for you?

[–] balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If you tell me "I will use some of any money you give me to fund terrorism" and I choose to give you money anyway, I am deliberately funding terrorism.

Framework is deliberately funding white nationalists. They may not have been before yesterday, but now they've been told and now they've been told that's what they're doing.

It's spelled TACO cause it's an initialism

[–] balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Tbh I'm not sure what you're saying here. Person said they had to scroll down 5 results to get to the asshole being an asshole and seemed to think that was proof it's hard to research (hence my "five whole links") and then you seemed to be saying that since it's "hard to find" and the business isn't slapping a nazi flag front and center on their website means it's fine to use their stuff. If that's not what you meant, great. But you said the same thing again, so I'm pretty sure you meant it.

view more: ‹ prev next ›