I don't understand the complaint. What exactly is the issue?
barubary
I'll update my mems when Microsoft decides to implement C99. (Hey, it's only been a quarter of a century ...)
Yeah, just don't make any mistakes and you'll be fine. Come on guys, how hard can it be?
The same is true of std::endl. std::endl is simply defined as << '\n' << std::flush
; nothing more, nothing less. In all cases where endl gives you a "properly translated" newline, so does \n
.
std::endl provides zero portability benefits. C++ does have a portable newline abstraction, but it is called \n
, not endl.
My CGI script is a SaaS.
for (int i = INT_MIN; ; i++) { ... if (i == INT_MAX) break;}
@racketlauncher831 As far as the C compiler is concerned, there is literally no difference between those two notations. If you declare a function parameter as an array (of T), the C compiler automatically strips the size information (if any) and changes the type to pointer (to T).
(And if we're talking humans, then char *args[]
does not mean "follow this address to find a list of characters" because that's the syntax for "array of pointers", not "pointer to array".)
@affiliate Hey, you didn't even mention that char *args[]
actually means char **args
in a parameter list.
Strictly speaking, it should be
Unsafe block syntax in C++
{ ...}
Do you know the difference between a script and a program?
A script is what you give the actors; a program is what you give the audience.