blakestacey

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I happened to learn recently that that's probably not from Keynes:

https://quoteinvestigator.com/2011/08/09/remain-solvent/

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

image descriptionScreenshot of Lawrence Krauss's Wikipedia article, showing a section called "Controversies" with subheadings "Relationship with Jeffrey Epstein" followed by "Allegations of sexual misconduct". Text at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Krauss#Controversies

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 14 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Regarding occasional sneer target Lawrence Krauss and his co-conspirators:

Months of waiting but my review copy of The War on Science has arrived.

I read Krauss’ introduction. What the fuck happened to this man? He comes off as incapable of basic research, argument, basic scholarship. [...] Um... I think I found the bibliography: it's a pdf on Krauss' website? And all the essays use different citation formats?

Most of the essays don't include any citations in the text but some have accompanying bibliographies?

I think I'm going insane here.

What the fuck?

https://bsky.app/profile/nateo.bsky.social/post/3lyuzaaj76s2o

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 5 points 1 month ago

Afterthought: This kind of brainrot, the petty middle-management style of ends justifying the means, is symbiotic with pundit brainrot, the mentality that Jamelle Bouie characterizes thusly.

It is sometimes considered gauche, in the world of American political commentary, to give words the weight of their meaning. As this thinking goes, there might be real belief, somewhere, in the provocations of our pundits, but much of it is just performance, and it doesn’t seem fair to condemn someone for the skill of putting on a good show.

Both reject the idea that words mean things, dammit, a principle that some of us feel at the spinal level.

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The way these people treat the written word confounds me. Whenever I cite a source, it's because I've read it and know what it says. The fact that "AI" facilitates the process of deciding on your conclusion and then filling in bullshit to prop it up makes "AI" corrosive to a person's moral fiber.

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 2 points 1 month ago

But I just met 'er!

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Startup carcass in alley this morning. Tire tread on burst bubble. This Valley is afraid of me. I have seen its true face. The prediction markets are extended gutters and the gutters are full of blood and when the drains finally scab over, all the techbros will drown. The accumulated filth of all their microdosing and Soylent will foam up about their waists and all the accelerationists and effective altruists will look up and shout "Save us!"

And I'll whisper, maybe later.

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Don't worry, Kelsey Piper managed to use it as an opportunity to be a bluecheck dipshit.

(via)

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

(massive bong rip) the aliens already came here and put us all in the Matrix, dude

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 10 points 1 month ago

That's just yer bog-standard "the best lie has a seed of truth", ainnit?

(Peer review in its modern form was adopted gradually, with a recognizable example in 1831 from the same William Whewell who coined the word scientist. It displaced the tradition of having the editor of a journal decide everything himself, so whatever its flaws, it has broadened the diversity of voices that influence what gets officially published.)

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Behold the power of this fully selective quotation.

view more: ‹ prev next ›