brain_pan

joined 2 years ago
[–] brain_pan@infosec.pub 4 points 1 year ago

drug joke, I think

[–] brain_pan@infosec.pub 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

he does not think about lemmy, we should likewise think of him less

[–] brain_pan@infosec.pub 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

perhaps it's not possible; the crunch strategy isn't working (and is grinding up and spitting out devs)

[–] brain_pan@infosec.pub 11 points 2 years ago

fr

Reddit Exodus: "reddit is being corporate and shitty and greedy, time to bounce"

Facebook shows up: "oh, let's let them; in fact, we should be happy that they're coming to the fediverse! only good things can come from this"

like it's as if y'all forgot the thing that just happened; why are you all so quick to give the corporation that only cares for money a chance

[–] brain_pan@infosec.pub 1 points 2 years ago

you are an example of why they're so strict about it

[–] brain_pan@infosec.pub 1 points 2 years ago

I'd think that most OG lemmy users were people like that, so it's not "small"

[–] brain_pan@infosec.pub 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

imo, the dicey part of the matter is "what amount of the AI's dataset is made up of actual images of children"

[–] brain_pan@infosec.pub 1 points 2 years ago

exactly what I was thinking

and on top of that what happens with a proven bad actor

would they be allowed to just jump to a new instance to harrass people?

[–] brain_pan@infosec.pub 1 points 2 years ago

you actually think corporations will always keep their word, don't you

and that somehow Google acting like it does is like some fluke or one bad apple or something, rather than Google acting in ways very normal and common to corporations

[–] brain_pan@infosec.pub 1 points 2 years ago

tbf, that's every social network isn't it?

[–] brain_pan@infosec.pub 2 points 2 years ago

for you and me perhaps, not all feel the same

[–] brain_pan@infosec.pub 9 points 2 years ago (3 children)

they're actually asking, so be serious

view more: next ›