chihuamaranian

joined 1 month ago
[–] chihuamaranian@lemmy.ca 34 points 3 days ago
  • sweats while nervously trying not to look at his home lab server rack in the office closet *
[–] chihuamaranian@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 days ago

"Customers who bought this also bought: VOID"

[–] chihuamaranian@lemmy.ca 15 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Personally, I don't mind the "I asked AI and it said..." Because I can choose to ignore anything that follows.

Yes, I can judge the sender. But consent is still in my hands.

Otherwise, I largely agree with the article on its points, and also appreciate it raising the overall topic of etiquette given a new technology.

Like the shift to smart phones, this changes the social landscape.

[–] chihuamaranian@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

Ugh, have my upvote.

You gave me second hand embarrassment because this was (admittedly an embellished version of) me during my undergraduate.

[–] chihuamaranian@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The FSF explanation of why they dislike Anubis could just as easily apply to the process of decrypting TLS/HTTPS. You know, something uncontroversial that every computer is expected to do when they want to communicate securely.

I don't fundamentally see the difference between "The computer does math to ensure end-to-end privacy" and "The computer does math to mitigate DDoS attempts on the server". Either way, without such protections the client/server relationship is lacking crucial fundamentals that many interactions depend on.