copygirl

The comments are worth a giggle but the AI voice ruins it. Also horrible choice of music.

Presumably this is because a block is different from the content being removed. It simply means the servers stop communicating with each other regarding new communities, posts and comments. This could allow the instance to be unblocked and the old content to continue existing – say for example when an instance has been acting badly, but it gets fixed some time later.

Blocked instances should probably not show up in search, but if you have a direct link to an old post, perhaps this should still be available? Not being able to block a community when its instance is already blocked makes sense, and probably doesn't matter if you mostly check for new content, but I can see it being a bother when its shows up in other situations. One could call this a bug, or an oversight, but I suppose it depends on what the intended result is.

Politicians decide things, but to actually make stuff happen, the government needs to collect taxes to pay for services that are then provided to the public. I think the idea here is to take out the middleman. You won't solve the problem country wide, but you'll help some people, and that's still worth it. Work together without like-minded people locally, be an inspiration, and show that it works. I've only been very briefly part of an activist group (specialized in food saving), so probably best to look elsewhere for good advice on how to do this well.

I didn't claim there wasn't a real person behind this. Did you check the profile you linked? They "wrote" an article titled "I asked ChatGPT how to overcome Imposter Syndrome". That already proves they use generative AI at least for some things. How do you explain the suspicious AI-like structure of the article?

It is my opinion that any "real" creator would not touch AI with a 10-foot pole, if just out of respect for fellow creators.

Well, they shouldn't. It makes them look less trustworthy.

The image is clearly AI generated, and the content looks incredibly suspicious as well considering the way it's structured.

I'm just going to report this.

Yeah, it should not be part of the text just like line numbers shouldn't be part of the code on a code hosting site, yet it can be visible, no? Later it does recommend using $ to distinguish command and output. Is it now okay for a beginner to be confused about what it means?

Is providing a number of commands to use that require user input really that bad? When people start tinkering with the command line, first of all they shouldn't trust just anything on the website blindly, which at the very least requires a basic understanding of how to enter commands, and respond to the terminal asking for input. The following "bad" example..

sudo apt update
sudo apt install software-properties-common
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:deadsnakes/ppa
sudo apt install python3.9

..is instead turned into this single command with even more confusing syntax for beginners:

sudo apt update && \
  sudo apt install --yes software-properties-common && \
  sudo add-apt-repository --yes ppa:deadsnakes/ppa && \
  sudo apt install --yes python3.9

Sure, it's convenient, but if you just throw blocks of code at people to run, are they really learning anything?

A better approach would be to have a quick tutorial on how to use the terminal and what the $ and # symbols mean (though they could be CSS decorators that can't be copied), what sudo is and warning people about running untrusted commands on their system. Then you just link to that at the top saying something along the lines of "if you're unfamiliar with running commands, and the following seems confusing, check this quick summary", behind a question mark icon connected to each block of commands, or similar.

I'm no authority to speak on this, but I can say (gender) identity and pronouns aren't necessarily linked. Some people might lean into the fairy thing for their aesthetic or identity, others wouldn't. Some might use fae/faer pronouns explicitly to break out of the gender binary / ternary, others might just find that these pronouns fit them. I hope someone with more knowledge on the matter could weigh on.

So drag isn't the problem, even though drag's a "troll" whose identity does not deserve respect (as you've repeatedly made clear in this thread), and you're pissed at the admin whose instance's rules are to respect identities and pronouns even regardless of that (and then enforcing those rules), instead of the admin of the instance that's hosting the supposed "troll" and enabling drag's behavior across many instances..?

Tell me how that's supposed to make sense. Or, actually, don't. I've seen plenty of your kind show their true colors over the course of trying to get through to you. You're just unable to deal with the fact that you got rightfully banned after breaking the rules, even after being told what the issue is multiple times. Grow up. Learn from your mistakes.