deaddigger

joined 2 months ago
[–] deaddigger@lemm.ee 26 points 23 hours ago

Bei der aktuellen qualität sehr wichtig

[–] deaddigger@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The twist-key style was patented by J. Osterhoudt in 1866.

Sorry i didnt know the correct english name for it. Further the question was what they used before can openers and that was mostly key taps

[–] deaddigger@lemm.ee 12 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Mostly by ring tabs, you can still see them with corned beef tins

[–] deaddigger@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago

Du hast dir die Minister aber schon angesehen oder? Da wird kein Problem angegangen werden, was wahrscheinlich zur afd in 4 jahren führt

[–] deaddigger@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago

Well going by the title ... i mean technically that is possible with all monitors

[–] deaddigger@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

"Jemand" could be the owner of the company, further 5. Explicitly mentions companies so this is kinda a void argument.

Who will tell you it's a stupid idea.

I mean i never argued against that, like you already postet anubis is a way better option and not against german law afaik

[–] deaddigger@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That's out of date anyway. How about this one.

Good to know

A crawler is a data processing machine, nothing more. therefor you are disrupting dataprocessing through data. If you think its not thats ok too. I would still advise to contact your lawyer in germany if you are thinking about hosting a zipbomb

[–] deaddigger@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

For research purposes you could make it password protected, which would make it legal, though. Like i said having one is a gray area, because the law is made extremly vague. Like i said i dont know of any judgements about it, but it is still a possibility. If you life in germany and are inclined for an archive bomb and care about your legal safety contact a lawyer beforehand

[–] deaddigger@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Good question i dont know tbh. Would be an interesting question for a lawyer influencer

[–] deaddigger@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Telecom for example does Deep PackageInspection. That is rather well kown. Derec made a statement years ago that it is normal for other european isps too. Here is a secondary source for it, i cant find the primary source anymore https://netzpolitik.org/2012/berec-studie-dpi-bei-vielen-providern-bereits-im-einsatz/

If you are succesful in disrupting some dataprocessing doesnt matter, trying to do it is illigal. If you put it there to disrupt crawlers you are trying to disrupt an entities dataprocessing.

If your isp does dpi an archive bomb is able to crash their server. Even if they have measures againt it, it is still illigal because trying it is illigal.

[–] deaddigger@lemm.ee 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (10 children)

I mean i am not a lawyer.

In germany we have § 303 b StGB. In short it says if you hinder someone elses dataprocessing through physical means or malicous data you can go to jail for up to 3 years . If it is a major process for someone you can get up to 5 and in major cases up to 10 years.

So if you have a zipbomb on your system and a crawler reads and unpacks it you did two crimes. 1. You hindered that crawlers dataprocessing 2. Some isp nodes look into it and can crash too. If the isp is pissed of enough you can go to jail for 5 years. This applies even if you didnt crash them due to them having protection against it, because trying it is also against the law.

Having a zipbomb is part of a gray area. Because trying to disrupt dataprocessing is illegal, having a zipbomb can be considered trying, however i am not aware of any judgement in this regard

Edit: btw if you password protect your zipbomb, everything is fine

[–] deaddigger@lemm.ee 22 points 1 week ago (15 children)

At least in germany having one of these on your system is illegal

 
view more: next ›