death

joined 2 weeks ago
[–] death@infosec.pub 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (5 children)

Of course, it depends on the conditions. But any (temporary) overcapacity becomes a problem for people with solar panels when they expect to pay off the cost of the panels not just with a reduction in drawing power from the grid but also with credits from sending power to the grid.

However, there are problems, with some grid operators even charging customers for energy sent to the grid during peak times, such as in NL: https://innovationorigins.com/en/solar-feed-in-tariffs-climb-18-in-six-months/

Solar without storage is less ideal than most people think.

[–] death@infosec.pub 2 points 5 days ago

Absolutely. But I also read about these concerns in The Netherlands and Belgium, which aren't quite California.

[–] death@infosec.pub 26 points 5 days ago (42 children)

While solar power is great and possibly the future, I sure hope they fully thought this through. A lot of areas with large numbers of solar panels are struggling to manage overcapacity. Solar energy produced is not always sent to the grid but wasted, as there is often not enough grid-scale storage capacity to absorb it. I'm no expert, but I wonder if mandating smart in-home sodium-ion batteries which intelligently charge and discharge based on grid capacity wouldn't be more effective.

[–] death@infosec.pub 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The same with Lightroom sadly. The open source alternatives are either too buggy or have UX designed by very "opinionated" people, making them painful and frustrating to use. I currently want to get rid of Lightroom but can't.

[–] death@infosec.pub 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ah, thanks. That was entirely unclear from this article.

[–] death@infosec.pub 7 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Another game I simply won't need to buy. Neat. I guess some publishers just don't like selling games or something.

[–] death@infosec.pub 102 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (18 children)

Perhaps that's because Steam doesn't seem to be trying very hard to "lock in" developers to their platform. Devs are free to sell their PC games on Gog or Epic or whatever. Steam is popular because it's a good platform. This freedom for developers or customers mostly does not exist on mobile or on consoles, except for the EUs efforts here.

Even their "console" the Steam Deck can, relatively easily, run games from other stores. I'm not saying a 30% cut should be considered fair but they do seem to take a different approach to digital sales than the other large players.

[–] death@infosec.pub 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Judging from the video description this seems to be a remake of the original Frostpunk in Unreal Engine. Not sure why they’re doing it. The original is still just fine.

[–] death@infosec.pub 6 points 2 weeks ago

It appears one of them will be looking for a new job soon, so this is good timing.

[–] death@infosec.pub 44 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

I wonder if this lawsuit could also affect The Late Show with Stephen Colbert.

[–] death@infosec.pub 172 points 2 weeks ago (15 children)

All for-profit tech eventually yields to enshittification.

view more: ‹ prev next ›