It does not appear to be a criminal case.
decayedproton
joined 2 years ago
(2) the prosecution getting the full resources it needs to go hard in 100% of cases, and the defense only getting those resources if the client is wealthy and otherwise “lol good luck sucker.”
What would you think of a rule giving a person charged with a crime a voucher payable to their lawyer, where the amount of the voucher is equal to the amount spent against them times a factor based on their income?
If people with this mindset could be happy with just having their own thing, not polluted with the ideas of others, there would be no conflict. Unfortunately the mindset requires that there can't be other people in the world doing their own thing.
I don't think it's fair to blame the company. The employees' wages went up by 500%^[when rounding up to the nearest positive multiple of 500%], so prices also had to go up by 500%.
From a certain perspective, you do have a garden.
There are two issues I see here.
The first is that WPA's (Word Prediction Algorithms) don't have any insight into topics; they just find probable matches for candidate words based on training texts. In fact the text pasted here, by making transparently irrelevant points, demonstrates its lack of ability to offer value.
The second is that the general attitude in most spaces in general is not strictly in favor of either more censorship or less censorship. Rather, the attitude that most people show is a fear that views they believe to be harmful will be promoted, while views they believe to be helpful will be either censored or placed at a comparative disadvantage. It would be natural for Lemmy communities to have the same attitude as most other humans.