you realise i'm gonna ask for links to your example of this being misapplied here
it's gonna be a massive disaster across the wider economy, and - and this is key - absolutely everyone saw this coming a year ago if not two
Labour are all about the billionaire donors these days.
and a terrible pub
yeah, "Did you know" exists to encourage new articles, or major expansions of old ones. it cycles every six hours I think.
the post history is very infosec dot pub
Wikipedia rules make more sense when you understand they are entirely to keep the most pedantic nerds on earth from fighting
This is specifically about the current shitty "AI Overview" that is currently and specifically pissing people off and Google essaying that as the only interface to search. (Sure they might not, but OTOH predicting future behaviour from past behaviour.)
That they did fucking terrible overviews in the past is not some sort of excuse for the current and specific issue with the current and specific AI Overviews.
wtf with calling hating this extremely hateworthy shit "uncanny-valley reactionism"
acronym-spouting rules lawyers who will crush dissent by a thousand duck nibbles
hey now, my duck nibbling is thoroughly weaponised
I've just realised:
this reads just like a neoreactionary trying to be literary
e.g. the Dimes Square literary astroturf crowd
same problem as gen AI output: too much style, zero understanding of basic structure, you cannot get that fine detailed in structure and be that bad at the basics.