dgerard

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] dgerard@awful.systems 15 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Yes, I know, I wrote it. Why do you consider this useful to post here?

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 12 points 3 months ago (6 children)

why did you post literally just the text from the article

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 3 points 3 months ago

yeah, I think that's enough

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 10 points 3 months ago

i love awful systems so much

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 9 points 3 months ago

The Register said in its Builder.AI obit that the company is really into making its devs use AI coding. lol.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 29 points 3 months ago (8 children)

quite amazing that (a) Microsoft basically bought open source with GitHub (b) and are now trying to fuck it up so hard people leave

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 7 points 3 months ago (3 children)

new Ziz story, coupla days ago https://www.sfchronicle.com/crime/article/ziz-rationalism-lasota-pasek-20323332.php

also featuring our old friend Zack Davis

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 8 points 3 months ago

a shitload i expect. but checking authorities actually exist is probably gonna become an obvious thing to do lol

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 3 points 3 months ago

I mean this post seems largely correct and reasonable, but ehh be a little cautious

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 9 points 3 months ago

word i hear is that too many lawyers fucking love this shit, they see plausible words and think that's sufficient to ~~replace~~ supplement the office peons

then this happens to them and lol

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

If you're after streams-crossing - this guy is a rationalist who does Manifold Markets

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

finally we have constructed a completely unsexy robot

 

As spotted by @mountainriver

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXc9-oD_iFo - video

 

Thinking about how the arsing fuck to explain the rationalists to normal people - especially as they are now a loud public problem along multiple dimensions.

The problem is that it's all deep in the weeds. Every part of it is "it can't be that stupid, you must be explaining it wrong."

With bitcoin, I have, over the years, simplified it to being a story of crooks and con men. The correct answer to "what is a blockchain and how does it work" is "it's a way to move money around out of the sight of regulators" and maybe "so it's for crooks and con men, and a small number of sincere libertarians" and don't even talk about cryptography or technology.

I dunno what the one sentence explanation is of this shit.

"The purpose of LessWrong rationality is for Yudkowsky to live forever as an emulation running on the mind of the AI God" is completely true, is the purpose of the whole thing, and is also WTF.

Maybe that and "so he started what turned into a cult and a series of cults"? At this point I'm piling up the absurdities again.

The Behind The Bastards approach to all these guys has been "wow these guys are all so wacky haha and also they're evil."

How would you first approach explaining this shit past "it can't be that stupid, you must be explaining it wrong"?

[also posted in sneer classic]

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7DZZuCi95o - video

my delivery was near perfect on this video, i'm very pleased

 

yeah i'm sure Matt Levine, qntm and Wildbow are gonna be champing at the bit to attend wordy racist fest

view more: ‹ prev next ›