why don't you look at the paper then and find out
Correct answers are correct answers.
you should be so lucky
So long as users understand the limitations of AI
this isn't those people
They specificallly named this one, you don't have to make up reasons that somehow it doesn't count.
yes that's the guy does nobody remember The Nightfly
in this case it was some dickhead, but I've had this shit from editors too
that's what got me: this guy was pissed off someone referenced Fagin at all, the crime of making the bozo feel uncomfortable at missing something by not reading
glasses are a fine kink! i guess those ones are a specialist taste
one of the most annoying things about writing for a US audience is they're fucking illiterate and alluding to books confuses them
wanna grab editors by the throat and go "JUST WHAT THE FUCK WERE YOU PEOPLE EVEN DOING IN HIGH SCHOOL"
actual example from today: "who the hell is Fagin never heard of him"
ah, was that Copilot or was it Copilot? It's MS's favourite name right now for its bad LLM initiatlves
Pivot to AI: Amy is retiring! Probably! yes my cowriter has heard the call of revolution and will be having full and frank debates in the marketplace of ideas. WIth sweet reason.
If Jason Wilson calls you for a quote, you give him your best.
61
and as the paper details, they don't do that either