e8d79

joined 10 months ago
[–] e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

You can't offload these kind of decision to the user. Just think about how effective the various fishing and social engineering attacks are. No, a fediverse dating app would have to be secure by default. The only possibility I see for this is something that involves homomorphic encryption, an encryption method that allows you to operate on data without having to decrypt it first, but I know nothing about that topic so I could be completely wrong. This vague idea of a solution might be technically impossible after all.

 

Just a guy making desktop software that solves a problem. Its 2025 and what used to be normal, selling software without subscription that you run locally on your computer, is now a unique feature.

[–] e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't think control features help much when one of the most basic question that you can ask is "What is your gender and who would you like to date?". As I have already outlined in another comment in this thread, this information has to be shared with the federated network and is already enough to get people into serious trouble should it get into the wrong hands.

Alternatively think about it this way. Would you hand over this kind of information to a total stranger? Would you take on the responsibility of handling data that could literally kill someone if you make a mistake?

[–] e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 days ago

You already lost the data at that point and you really don't want to play roulette with data that has the potential of killing your users. Just imagine what could happen if a gay man from Saudi Arabia joined your instance and that data leaks.

[–] e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

No, data must be shared between instances for federation to make any sense and the operators of other instances don't necessarily share your views about privacy and security. Lets take for example a matching algorithm like the one OkCupid used to use. You answer some questions and based upon those people are recommended to you. If you want to see people from other instances as well, the answers to the questions must be shared between all federated instances; but at the same time these answers contain private details about you. I don't think a workable solution to this problem exists, even if you come up with an algorithm that allows you to make decisions on anonymized data. The danger of deanonymization due to a bug is too high.

[–] e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 2 days ago (9 children)

I would have serious concerns regarding data privacy. You share intimate and very private details about yourself on these apps that could be used for blackmail. I wouldn't feel comfortable sharing that on a federated network. For example, how would you ensure data isn't logged by a hostile server operator. A company is at least forced to play lip service to privacy laws. The theoretical operator of fedi-date.ru can do what they want.

[–] e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 2 days ago

Obsidian stores the notes in a well known plaintext format on your computer. They can't easily hold you hostage like with other closed source apps.

 

It's just two days after the upstream release and Plasma 6.3 is already rolled out to Fedora Kinoite users.

[–] e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 week ago

Uranium Fact: 1.7 Billion years ago there existed a natural occurring nuclear fission reactor.

[–] e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 week ago

It has only three letters and its on the .com top-level domain. That's it.

[–] e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So this is a man-in-the-middle attack waiting to happen isn't it? Buy the domain, setup a reverse proxy that points to the original hexbear server IP and start logging all requests.

[–] e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 1 week ago

The creator of that apparently got really angry when people told them that it looked like garbage.

Any comment applying criticisms toward the AI interpolation process or appearance, no matter their nature, will be deleted.

1
DivestOS ends development (www.divestos.org)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de to c/privacy@lemmy.world
122
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
 

This is a proposal by some AI bro to add a file called llms.txt that contains a version of your websites text that is easier to process for LLMs. Its a similar idea to the robots.txt file for webcrawlers.

Wouldn't it be a real shame if everyone added this file to their websites and filled them with complete nonsense. Apparently you only need to poison 0.1% of the training data to get an effect.

 

This video discusses how you getting mad at Andrew Tate, Jake Paul and other such characters is playing right into their hand. There are some controversial takes in there but overall I liked the message.

 

The Dutch data protection authority (DPA) has issued a decision and is imposing a fine of €4.75 million against Netflix because it failed to adequately inform customers about what it does with their data. Netflix has already objected to the fine, but hasn’t yet appealed the decision as a whole.

 

It was merged after they where rightfully ridiculed by the community.

The awful response to the backlash by matwojo really takes the cake:

I've learned today that you are sensitive to ensuring human readability over any concerns in regard to AI consumption

view more: next ›