So tired, in fact, you didn't even attach the meme.
felixsu7
joined 1 month ago
My two cents: There are so many good things that AI (or the relevant type and sub-type) can do to help humanity. This is simply not one of them, why would you train a model just to transform a picture into something with a "stolen" style? I mean, i guess it is actually cool, but that's it, people gonna use it to mass produce slop, in a style that isn't theirs or even the creators of the model. This is already happening before, but ah, it is "upgraded" now.
Sure, the style isn't copyrighted, but unless Studio Ghibli has stated that it's fine (likely not from what i have heard), it's basically legal theft, not like this is the first time it happened, though unfortunately. And what's more, it's for profit, and OpenAI isn't "open", those profits? None to Studio Ghibli.
Edit: I realized that you could say that real human artists can do the same thing, "legal theft" of styles or whatever, i personally think that's fine as long as they say that it's not their style or simply was inspired. My issue is that the required skill to do that just dropped so low, one can automate the mass production of AI slop, and there are now even more incentives to it.
Can we get a permanent outage of that goddamned website, pretty please? For the sake of humanity?
There have been so many instances where i wanna see replies of a post or more stuff about a person, but then that mandatory account log in wall kicks in.
Helpful video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kyc_ysVgBMs
But basically, the picture was a cropped frame from a CSAM content, which then their systems thought you are posting CSAM content when you did not.
About the legal consequences, i am not a lawyer, but i don't think you will be visited by the police anytime soon, since the picture you posted isn't CSAM by itself, just a cropped portion which does not contain the material itself.
Edit: as someone said, it goes through multiple human reviews.
So when they do it for profit and "innovation", it's "Fair Use" and legal.
But when i do it for educational purposes only, it's "piracy" and illegal.
Huh, okay then, it's fine for them to "steal" then basically turn that into profit, but when we do it not for profit, it's not fine.