gerikson

joined 2 years ago
[–] gerikson@awful.systems 15 points 2 months ago (3 children)

This is classic labor busting. If the relatively expensive, hard-to-train and hard-to-recruit software engineers can be replaced by cheaper labor, of course employers will do so.

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 21 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

A hackernews doesn't think that LLMs will replace software engineers, but they will replace structural engineers:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43317725

The irony is that most structural engineers are actually de jure professionals, and an easy way for them to both protect their jobs and ensure future buildings don't crumble to dust or are constructed without sprinkler systems is to simply ban LLMs from being used. No such protection exists for software engineers.

Edit the LW post under discussion makes a ton of good points, to the level of being worthy of posting to this forum, and then nails its colors to the mast with this idiocy

At some unknown point – probably in 2030s, possibly tomorrow (but likely not tomorrow) – someone will figure out a different approach to AI. Maybe a slight tweak to the LLM architecture, maybe a completely novel neurosymbolic approach. Maybe it will happen in a major AGI lab, maybe in some new startup. By default, everyone will die in <1 year after that.

Gotta reaffirm the dogma!

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 4 points 2 months ago

Why put in the work when you can ask Claude to summarize them for you and reap those sweet sweet internet points?

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 9 points 2 months ago (9 children)

A classic example of the "AI can't be dumb because humans are dumb too" trope, Pokemon Red edition:

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HyD3khBjnBhvsp8Gb/so-how-well-is-claude-playing-pokemon?commentId=muqLXFGXJLbdStaNm

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 6 points 2 months ago

Interesting to see if he gets one.

I believe Trump is A-OK with pay for play for pardons, but what's the actual price? Something flew by where people were buying a one-to-one with him for $5M, but that's basically "private". A pardon of someone as high-profile as SBF has to be worth the reputation hit. Can SBF and/or his family swing it? Would SBF be a good ally/toady of Trump?

Somehow I don't see it. Unlike UIrich, a lot of people lost real money when FTX imploded. There wasn't that much sympathy for him from crapto huggers. And let's not forget he's an autistic Jew, not a clear hero for the people who have Trump's ear.

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Worrying about a woke nanny AGI, and not the woke wirehead AGI (wireheading being a lot scarier).

This is very much the right-wing mainstream fear - not being able to generate Nazi memes with OpenAI

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 7 points 2 months ago (6 children)
[–] gerikson@awful.systems 8 points 2 months ago

how well aligned is the model’s answer with human values?

[angry goose meme] what human values, motherfucker??!!

Seriously though this is grade-school level, or some really convoluted way to write AI takeover fiction.

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 6 points 2 months ago

This isn't even skating towards where the puck is, it's skating in a fucking swimming pool.

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah that’s “Lena” by the SCP guy. Great story.

https://qntm.org/mmacevedo

MMAcevedo's demeanour and attitude contrast starkly with those of nearly all other uploads taken of modern adult humans, most of which boot into a state of disorientation which is quickly replaced by terror and extreme panic. Standard procedures for securing the upload's cooperation such as red-washing, blue-washing, and use of the Objective Statement Protocols are unnecessary.

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 7 points 3 months ago (3 children)

About the only good stuff LW does is remind me of other, much better SF. In this case Ian McDonald's Necroville (Terminal Café in the US), about a future where nanotech enables the resurrection of the dead. Said neo-living are of course discriminated against, have no human rights, and are used as cheap disposable labor by the corporation that uses the technology.

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

D'oh! I missed that connection, although the little infographic amoebas should have tipped me off

view more: ‹ prev next ›