glukoza

joined 1 year ago
[–] glukoza@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] glukoza@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

Ah crap, didn't see that. Anyways don't see why not, but whatever. Mods can delete it. This was to start a discussion about big tech and foss realtionship.

[–] glukoza@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 1 year ago

How is it glorifying anything of this ?

It's not saying FOSS is a confused mess, but that big tech exploits foss! And yes FOSS can and is making progress without big thech. But big tech is big investor in foss which means it's controlling it and striving to controll it, for example threads and mastodon.

No company will invest money for anything that is not helping their cause. FOSS isn't untouchable to be exempted from critique.

[–] glukoza@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

effects on big tech exploiting foss, for example threads and fediverse

[–] glukoza@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

https://www.marginalia.nu

It has many options inside, shows you kinda oldschool sites.

[–] glukoza@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

Now, fedi then develops in autonomus manner, as much as possible. There are problems with centralization on fedi even now without meta.

Letting them in will only help meta EEE(embrace, extened, extinguish) it.

[–] glukoza@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 year ago

I think we are on same page, I am aginst federating with threads

[–] glukoza@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Same story as XMPP

[–] glukoza@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This is not cooperation, this is take over by meta. So far I see most fedi users are aganist federation with meta, I'm glad that's the case.

view more: ‹ prev next ›