ideonek

joined 1 month ago
[–] ideonek@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago

Feel like we all loose.

[–] ideonek@piefed.social 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Is this the one with hospital death comics simplified to lines and shapes? My senciere appologies for being old.

[–] ideonek@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago

Capitan? Please help.

[–] ideonek@piefed.social 22 points 1 month ago (8 children)

I'll bite:

XLIII

[–] ideonek@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago

This is the part that resonated with me the most as the casual user. The interface is, so confusing that the differences between various forms of chats seems deliberately unclear. And all that's "useful" is opt-in. And Groups - most used in corporate or project setting, can't be encrypted at all? That's... peculiar.

Again, thanks for the eye-opener.

[–] ideonek@piefed.social 11 points 1 month ago

No, I can't stress enough how much I appreciate it. What I do right now is sending this article with TLDR to all my friends and family.

[–] ideonek@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Any advice for people that used it in the past? After reading the article, my understanding is that what was sent in "private chat" was in fact encrypted (for the most part) and can be considered secured (to the degree - something is off and, maybe we didn't find out yet, how the encryption is compromised). But it would wise to treat all other conversations as something that is compromised. Is this a fair summary?

[–] ideonek@piefed.social 25 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Well, it was obvious to you. I'm a casual user, who tries to "do his best" and consider himself "somewhat informed" - obviously not by your standard. It was all news to me, and I find tremendous value in this article.

[–] ideonek@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago

Go for the Owls and sent the letter up with a rumor that the De-Gnoming procedure is about to start. They are not that bright. They will run down to you.

[–] ideonek@piefed.social 10 points 1 month ago

I don't know.... if only we have something like hard data from things like investing that could prove that women are better and making long-term decision and are less likely to make a rush decisions based on short-lived noise. You write like it's something we know from at least from early 2000s. It's not like it's a strong and growing consensus now, right?

[–] ideonek@piefed.social 12 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Is open-source washing really a thing? Any examples come to mind?

[–] ideonek@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago

That is... a very good point. Not only in the environmental niche, we desperately crave more "it may be legal, but it needs to be stopped" stories. It would actually make more sense narratively. Gave them the actual reason to vigilante.

view more: ‹ prev next ›