jbloggs777

joined 2 years ago
[โ€“] jbloggs777@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago (4 children)

You can typically upgrade versions with the discount too. I won't give them another dime, though. Tried SPTarkov? It's great for PvE, and adds value even to the base edition.

And a developer with admin rights will never admit that they'll quit on short notice in a few months, leaving hard to support snowflakes, each based on the latest cool fad at the time of writing.

Both k8s and aws native services can be chaotic and snowflaky... An organization should be working to standardize the tech stack and deployment tooling across teams as much as possible.

K8S is an opportunity to standardize, but the potential is often not realised. Platform Engineering is now the latest kid on the block, trying to address the next layer of challenges. We'll see how this looks in a few years...

[โ€“] jbloggs777@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

What do you have against the project and the people behind it? It sounds personal.

There are plenty of non-commercial Linux distributions. Some managed better than others. Some generic, some with niches. OpenWRT is a favourite of mine.

They could. The protocol also supports IP spoofing, so doxing could also be a thing.

For individuals, it is a time consuming and costly legal process, whether justified or not. For the law firm, it costs a few cents per letter, but they get a few hundred (or more) euros when some sucker pays.

[โ€“] jbloggs777@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 week ago (4 children)

In Germany and no doubt some other countries, private law firms can (on behalf of the copyright holders) request people's identity based on residential IP addresses and then send extortionist legal threats. Apparently an IP appearing on a public tracker can be enough to trigger it, without any confirmed data transfer.

VPNs are common and usually sufficient.

[โ€“] jbloggs777@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Neither one of the two links seem to support your two claims. I gave you the benefit of the doubt by assuming you pasted the wrong link(s). shrug.

[โ€“] jbloggs777@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[โ€“] jbloggs777@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Mandatory coat check-ins, here we come!

The cops won't actually do anything, but you will have a case #. Theft is a crime, and crime should be reported.

[โ€“] jbloggs777@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

What are your geographic constraints, if any?

[โ€“] jbloggs777@discuss.tchncs.de 96 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

She is just on someone else's payroll.

[โ€“] jbloggs777@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

With apparmor, you could enable and disable profiles that could restrict access to files and paths by name.

For network traffic, it's possible to use dnsmasq to blacklist or whitelist some domains.

view more: next โ€บ