jjjalljs

joined 2 years ago
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 0 points 19 minutes ago (2 children)

Every smoker I've met gets very defensive about "why can't I breathe my toxic fumes on everyone else?? What's the big deal?? And then they get so mad when I litter like get over yourself"

Smoking in public is indefensible. There are smoking cessation programs.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 2 points 22 minutes ago

Conservatives have no real value system beyond "what is good for me right now?". They like or dislike things for transient, emotional, reasons. They might be in favor of charity when it's doing something they personally benefit from, but that's about as far as their reasoning goes.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 12 points 1 hour ago (5 children)

Conservatives would say this is communism and bad, which is why we should kill and eat conservatives.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network -2 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Probably because they're addicted, enjoy the high, and don't have the means or strength of character to quit.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 5 points 5 hours ago

People that work at microsoft could stop this. With means gentler than "Crack open the CEO's skull with a hammer", too.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 23 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

I don't use Spotify. It feels kind of soulless.

Bandcamp was the best, I think. They're still around, but their future is uncertain after being bought and sold. They have human written posts about like "the best doom in Texas" or "what's new in punk".

Whenever I talk to people that say they like music, and I suggest they buy albums instead of renting them from Spotify, they look at me like I'm crazy. They'd rather sell their soul for a little convenience. (And these aren't poor people or teenagers with no money. I worked in tech and all my peers were six figure salary. They can afford to buy three albums a month for $18. Which frankly isn't much more than a subscription, but then you get to keep something and eventually have a huge library)

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah this feels like another thing that's downstream from low wages.

Movies are a luxury. If most people are struggling to get by in debt, they're less likely to splurge.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 5 points 19 hours ago

It's too bad there's not a strong religious left that was into, like, flipping over their tables and beating these guys with whips.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 17 points 20 hours ago

Zuckerberg put in his will "Anyone who kills me gets a billion dollars". Bold move, but apparently legal!

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 11 points 20 hours ago

I don't think "This other, largely unrelated, problem is bad so we shouldn't do this thing" is good reasoning.

I don't think in the real world, in all places (or even most places) all the stores are in a cartel. Where I live, there are several large supermarkets and a handful of smaller groceries all within walking distance. They are not a cartel. They compete. You're just making stuff up for some weird dark fantasy of yours.

Furthermore, if there was a monopoly, and we have the political might to implement UBI, I dare say we'd also have the political power to do a tried-and-true popular move of breaking up monopolies.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 12 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

If there's only one grocery store, maybe. But that's a monopoly, and that's going to be shit no matter what. Ideally you have multiple grocery stores that compete, and if one raises prices the other will take their customers. (If they all coordinate to raise their prices, that's a cartel and that's also bad.)

So you're not really exposing a problem with UBI, but rather with unregulated capitalism.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

We should get rid of the republicans. We know who they are and where they live.

 

I tried it a bit with my reaper in pve and it seemed okay, but I wasn't doing anything challenging that really put it to the test. I haven't tried the others classes yet.

 

Currently, I'm polite to friendly with all of them. No outstanding conflicts. It's sometimes literal kitchen table poly with one, and the others I only see at like parties and such.

Some years ago I had two partners that absolutely did not get along with each other, and that was rough. Recently I was able to do a dinner with 3 partners and everyone had a good time.

I try not to make a big deal about folks meeting. I try to model after meeting your friend's friends.

 

For me there's a bit of a network effect where the polycule sprawls out into the distance. Partners have partners who have partners.

But for disconnected folks, it's mostly been tinder (yuck), and a local meetup.

(Also this might be the first post? That or nothing federated yet)

 

Like I saw one that was titled "I wonder why rule" and had a picture about overpaid CEOs or something.

Why "rule"? What's the origin of this format?

view more: next ›