limitedduck

joined 2 years ago
[–] limitedduck@awful.systems 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

What is wrong with it? That's exactly what he shows in the video. When betting it all, equal wins and losses is a net loss. The point is betting some fraction such that the gains overtake the losses

[–] limitedduck@awful.systems 1 points 2 years ago

My takeaways would be:

  1. Never trust averages on their face
  2. Being consistent gives you an advantage
  3. Always be looking to reevaluate your situation and maximize what you can get out of it
[–] limitedduck@awful.systems 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This is true if you're betting everything you have. By not having shrinking bets after losses you can tap into the net gains. Compare 1 win followed by 1 loss with $100 start:

Win is $100+$80 = $180

Loss is $180-$90 = $90

Compare with fixed bets of $50 with bank of $100:

Win is $100+$40 = $140

Loss is $140-$25 = $115

[–] limitedduck@awful.systems 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The key is not letting your losses affect your bet amount. With the gain being only 80% instead of 100%, betting your bank means 1 win and 1 loss leaves you with less than you started. Making your bet amount fixed between flips means 1:1 will instead give you a net gain. The Kelly Criterion says there is an optimal proportion of bank you can bet that will maximize this gain over many flips

[–] limitedduck@awful.systems 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)
view more: ‹ prev next ›