I'd claim that it should not be about "anyone". It should be targeted. If you are to "disturb" someone, better do this intentionally and with the clear idea what such disturbance is meant to achieve.
I'm not saying you should stand still. I'm saying that you should think before (and after) you act. Wouldn't hurt too much, would it?
But should it be extreme? I reckon it should be effective instead. Whether effective means awareness, resignations or something else is a conversation that varies a lot from context to context.
...in a time that many more countries should do the same... at least until we find a way to force these companies to comply with our laws.
I guess bridging with bluesky currently this does not make much sense to lemmy users?
As I understand it, Lemmy users do not have public messages, so no contextless posts like on Mastodon or Bluesky. On the other hand BridgyFed does not support communities, as a community cannot follow it.
So the way I have been using federation via ActivityHub, following communities and posting from mastodon, cannot be done from bluesky.
La mia impressione è che va bene solo nei casi che sono talmente semplici, che dopo riesca facilmente a verificare che non ci siano errori.
Nel mio caso non trovo tanti occasioni di fare qualcosa che è più veloce rileggere e potenzialmente correggere, piuttosto che farlo da capo.
Dall'altra parte, a volte se becco un errore, invece che correggere, chiedo di nuovo e sputa una cosa abbastanza diversa.
Ma qualcuno di voi è riuscito a trovare un'applicazione utile? Sarei curioso a vedere come si comporta, perché chatgpt-4 fa proprio schifo
The beauty of pluralism is that it allows for different means (and metrics) of achieving a goal.
And I'm saying this as someone coming from a post-communist country where totalitarianism is the powerful position.