mawhrin

joined 2 years ago
[–] mawhrin@awful.systems 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

some twenty four years ago i managed, amongst others, a company's samba and print server (that was at the time when all the company's servers were beige boxes with less memory and disk than the laptop i'm using to type this – and still they served a few hundred employees).

the machine developed a strange custom of hard-resetting itself, which we initially tracked to specific files being sent for printing; the behaviour was fully reproducible.

as it happened, it was a hardware fault somewhere between the mainboard and the integrated SCSI card; installing a separate SCSI card and reconnecting the disks and backup tape device fixed the problem. (i did not have the budget for a new serwer, no.)

establishing the actual cause took me fucking weeks.

[–] mawhrin@awful.systems 19 points 11 months ago (3 children)

the use of “DEI hire” is a shorthand for “i'm a massive racist shitweasel”

[–] mawhrin@awful.systems 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

oh. perhaps you could explain this to the authors of the article?

[–] mawhrin@awful.systems 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

i host my mail services for the last twenty seven years, and yeah, you're talking shit. starting the smtp daemon is not the same as managing mail server.

[–] mawhrin@awful.systems 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

i'm sure a quick look at stock prices will sweeten the pill.

[–] mawhrin@awful.systems 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

this is not people's laziness; it's that the practice is deceptive. don't reinforce the business narrative.

[–] mawhrin@awful.systems 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

this is quite infuriating, i had a number of mozilla/firefox people telling me that this feature wouldn't work with opt-in (it's bullshit though) because too few users would enable it, and neither fucker asked himself : “wait, if we're afraid we can't convince our user base to buy-in, perhaps we shouldn't develop the feature?”

[–] mawhrin@awful.systems 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

this modern example of censorship is pretty wild: uk actively enforces this ban despite the fact the sdlp mp for foyle, colum eastwood, used his parlliamentary privilege to get cleary's name into hansard, and at the time i still had a twitter account, the tweets naming the bastard were either reported or sweeped by some internal search. you won't see cleary's name mentioned on reddit either.

[–] mawhrin@awful.systems 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

tbh i used mawhrin-skel just because i needed a new drone, and twitter (at the time) bonked my skaffen-amtiskaw persona – i named the murdering british soldier that cannot be named in the united kingdom (david james cleary); i definitely value other culture books more than player of games. :-)

[–] mawhrin@awful.systems 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

i would think they didn't read it carefully, and/or until the end, and don't realise that ultimately it's gurgeh's revulsion at azad's societal rules, and him fully embracing the culture's values, that allows him to win and burn the empire to pieces.

[–] mawhrin@awful.systems 2 points 1 year ago

yeah, pretending that this is just a misunderstanding of the language is a bit disingenuous, but i'm not going to argue with the results.

this:

[–] mawhrin@awful.systems 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

it would help if you could state your position more clearly. (in case of caryn marjorie, it was clearly not what she wanted, which should be enough, and that before we even consider the ethics issues built-in into the technology.)

view more: ‹ prev next ›