melvisntnormal

joined 2 years ago
[–] melvisntnormal@feddit.uk 3 points 1 week ago

In my experience, people who like cock and balls generally like looking at cock and balls in porn, if only for help fantasising about playing with said cock and balls. Dressing them up makes them less sexual and more humourous, which someone might be into in the same way as playing "got your nose" with your arse cheeks. Though it's only funny for a split second when you're not expecting it, then you actually have to remove the costume in order to access the cock and balls.

[–] melvisntnormal@feddit.uk 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think it's because most of those folks don't want to see other people's Johnsons.

I mean... Men who like men exist, though I say that as a pan-guy that doesn't really seek out penis. Not repulsed, they just seem boring. Seeing them dressed up is actually funny and interesting until I get bored

[–] melvisntnormal@feddit.uk 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Do you want another 9/11?

Even if they don't, it feels like it would help them...

[–] melvisntnormal@feddit.uk 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Similar interface, different values. Not to say that the one in the article isn't absolutely egregious as well though, so my point only really matters if you care about OP's image specifically.

[–] melvisntnormal@feddit.uk 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Legally, the King can exercise the royal prerogative unilaterally. However, it's widely thought that if he ever did so, Parliament would act quickly to remove the last of that power, so it's exercised on the advice of the Prime Minister as a matter of convention.

ETA: Apparently, it's debatable whether this also applies to dissolving Parliament, even though that's a prerogative power. See this article on the Royal Prerogative in the UK

[–] melvisntnormal@feddit.uk 9 points 1 month ago

Not only that, but unless the vacant sheets are filled soon, the justices have to vote unanimously for the impeachment, as it must be two thirds of the seats, not the justices, that need to vote to convict. As there are only six justices out of nine, one dissenting judge is enough to reinstate Yoon.

[–] melvisntnormal@feddit.uk 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Whatever is in the background looks like they have a nice arse

[–] melvisntnormal@feddit.uk 14 points 2 months ago

I'm not a trans person, but I'm pretty sure that "assigned X at birth" refers to whatever gender is assigned on one's birth certificate.

[–] melvisntnormal@feddit.uk 3 points 3 months ago

I still see it sometimes when connecting my Steam Deck to my TV

[–] melvisntnormal@feddit.uk 1 points 3 months ago

Dude... That's so depressing to read, I'm so sorry. I'm sure it wouldn't help, and I'm pretty certain I can guess the answer, but did you ever tell your mum when you were older? Are you still in contact with her? Can't blame you if you're not, I probably would go NC myself.

[–] melvisntnormal@feddit.uk 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

[update: this was a misunderstanding]

Here's the update for convenience

(... saw this on my feed, only just thought to check the community itself to see if there was another post, my bad)

[–] melvisntnormal@feddit.uk 7 points 6 months ago

P E R S O N A 🔫

view more: next ›