okamiueru

Gotcha. Thanks for clarifying.

Did you mean to suggest that Mac is better than Linux? In what way?

What have you tried so far?

I don't see what the big deal is. This is just a Roman roof shape.

I have never seen a clearer divide and correlation between the value I observe being produced, and those that don't understand the limitations and value of LLMs.

It's exhausting, because, yes, LLMs are extremely valuables, but only as so far as to solve the problem of "possible suggestions", and never as "answers and facts". For some reason, and I suppose it's the same as for why bullshit is a thing, people conflate the two. And, not just any "people" either, but IT developers and IT product managers, all the way up. The ones that have every reason to know better, are the ones that seem to be utterly clueless as to what problems it solves well, what is irresponsible for it do be used for, correctly evaluating ethics, privacy and security, etc. Sometimes I feel like I'm in a mad house or just haven't found the same hallucinogenic that everyone else is on.

These articles just stink corporate interests. "You'd have to pay 20% more than a competitor, if the difference is requiring not working from home." rings a lot different than "please master, don't make me go back, I'll work for 20% less and be happy, it's a win-win, right?"

Let's see how competitive the company is when you are off by at least 20% and the ones who work from home at the competing firms are more productive at it too.

Listen... The first post you replied to was very obviously sarcasm, which you also very obviously didn't get. Now, I don't know what your issue is, nor do I care all that much. Good luck.

Just... Consider whether you didn't read it correctly? Don't know what else to tell you.

You didn't understand what you replied to, at all.

I too would like to know!

The only silver lining is old age and terrible health.

The argument is that the explanation was valid, and whether or not you found it valid, is more to do with your inability to get it. Now, this isn't saying anything about you, because you might get it. So, the "you", is not the particular you, but rather "one such that would meet the requirement". But hey, you do you.