pearcake

joined 7 months ago
[–] pearcake@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

I’ve tried all alternatives to google and I like Qwant the most so far

[–] pearcake@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm suggesting that praising people who cosplay as opposition is cringe. The closest thing to real russian opposition are not some pathetic vloggers, but fighters who fight for Ukraine, for example, like "Freedom of Russia" legion, etc.

[–] pearcake@sh.itjust.works -4 points 2 weeks ago

Nah bruh I’m just a Ukrainian who knows how real fighting, protesting and opposition looks like, and what russian “opposition” does is not it.

[–] pearcake@sh.itjust.works -4 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

How exactly he fought anything? Gathered donations and led students for a few useless protests? Pathetic.

[–] pearcake@sh.itjust.works -3 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

None of these clowns are “fighting” putin, best they can do is collect donations and pat each other on the back for doing it. Most of them cannot even condemn the war or annexation of Crimea properly.

[–] pearcake@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

Shit article written by LLM, promoting other shitty LLMs

[–] pearcake@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

In my experience the developers that can harness this change the best are the more experienced ones. However, paradoxically in my experience these are often the ones that dismiss it the most.

Because this shit doesn't work bud, and neither will you, after the AI bubble will burst, and there will be no demand in manipulative, crappy articles.

[–] pearcake@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If you need a metaphor to prove your point- you have already lost an argument.

[–] pearcake@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

Sure, and people who buy wheelchairs should teach themselves to walk.

[–] pearcake@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (8 children)

I just say that people struggle with using ChatGPT

If people struggle with product that is advertised as something that should help people talking to computers and get more productive with them - then its a failed product.

[–] pearcake@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 months ago

But LLMs are tools for imbeciles. If you can formulate your question correctly, you can just google it and get similar results from stackoverflow or reddit. LLMs searching the internal internet archive or use live google search anyway, but outputs results in slightly different style and sometimes glues answers together in seemingly cohesive manner, but at the same time leaving other context clues out of the picture - for example, doing search in google and visiting actual website with source info, you can gauge how credible it is by looking at answer upvotes, comments, date of the original answer, etc. LLMs strip that valuable information away and just provide you with castrated answer. Not to mention limited context window of any LLM, which causes funny hallucinations if you overstretch it. LLMs are solution in search of a problem, they cannot help dumb people, and they do not provide enough value to smart people.

[–] pearcake@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Yeah, I was also under the impression that they will create proper search engine for regular users, the AI crap is cancer

view more: next ›