scratchee

joined 2 years ago
[–] scratchee@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago

And we’re equally disappointed in both of you for following our terrible example.

[–] scratchee@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’ve wondered before if someone could start an “uninsurance” company which makes the same deals with hospitals that insurance providers do, but charges its customers almost nothing and just lets the customer pay their deal price. I guess the hospitals would catch on and refuse to deal eventually…

[–] scratchee@feddit.uk 41 points 2 weeks ago

But grandpa, how did you earn a sense of pride and accomplishment if you didn’t throw real money to the business men for every little thing you do?!

[–] scratchee@feddit.uk 1 points 2 weeks ago

Around, of course!

[–] scratchee@feddit.uk 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The obvious limitation being that you can take a real photo with attestation with a real camera of a real computer screen displaying any fake shit you can imagine, then you have an officially hashed photo of anything.

[–] scratchee@feddit.uk 33 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I’m not a fan of the laws regardless, but if we pretend for a second they’re justified, it’s worth considering how they should work in a case like Wikipedia. Wikipedia has quite strong protections against problem content already, and that’s because it has a shared global view of content with effective moderation tools and a wide moderator base that respects the rules. That reality should be taken into account in the governments new rules. On the other hand, anyone who understands how this all works was already against this stupid law, so I guess they didn’t get any useful feedback internally

[–] scratchee@feddit.uk 1 points 2 weeks ago

The sun is great and all, but it keeps insisting on dropping behind the earth or the clouds at awkward moments.

[–] scratchee@feddit.uk 9 points 3 weeks ago

Conflating racism and legitimate complaints about Israel’s behaviour is a common complaint made about some of Israel’s defenders. Seems to me you’ve just done exactly the same thing from the other direction.

[–] scratchee@feddit.uk 1 points 3 weeks ago

Sure, that’s absolutely true, but the games that have done well recently have found ways to properly take advantage of an “easy” market. I suspect the lesson is just that this particular market is well suited to smaller and simpler games but with quick turnaround, there’s nothing inherently wrong with that, if anything it means small games companies can shoot for big wins, which can only be a good thing.

[–] scratchee@feddit.uk 1 points 3 weeks ago

I would say I’m wiser now at twice the age, but I and most of my class at school had fairly reasonable political views from my recollection; maybe a bit naive and simplistic in a few cases, and a little bit of groupthink going on, and at least one die hard communist (though I imagine he still is, so I doubt that affects much either way).

16yo is old enough to do pretty much all the other big decisions of an adult, so why not voting, they’re not really treated like children anymore by our society.

[–] scratchee@feddit.uk 32 points 3 weeks ago

According to this guy: separating them from their family and upending their life is just barely enough.

[–] scratchee@feddit.uk 1 points 3 weeks ago

Fair, we certainly won’t see any perfect or even good solutions given human nature and the large population, but I do think we can achieve mediocre success if we really work hard

view more: ‹ prev next ›