self

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] self@awful.systems 10 points 3 months ago

this is utterly pointless and you’ve taken up way too much space in the thread already

It sounds to me like you have a very clear bias, and you don’t care at all about whether or not what they said is actually true or not, as long as the headlines about AI are negative

oh no, anti-AI bias in TechTakes? unthinkable

[–] self@awful.systems 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

also:

So in that thinking, Wikipedia is not open source, if the editor used a proprietary browser?

fucking no! how in fuck do you manage to misunderstand LLMs so much that you think the weights not being reproducible is at all comparable to… editing Wikipedia from a proprietary browser???? this shit isn’t even remotely exotic from an open source standpoint — it’s a binary blob loaded by an open source framework, like how binary blob modules taint the Linux kernel (you glided right past this reference when our other poster made it, weird that) or how loading a proprietary ROM in an open source emulator doesn’t make the ROM open source. the weights being permissively licensed doesn’t make them open source (or really make any sense at all) if the source literally isn’t available.

[–] self@awful.systems 17 points 3 months ago (2 children)

my fucking god how have you missed the point this hard. fuck off

[–] self@awful.systems 12 points 3 months ago

fuck off promptfan

[–] self@awful.systems 19 points 3 months ago
[–] self@awful.systems 19 points 3 months ago (3 children)

what if none of it’s good, all of it’s fraud (especially the benchmarks), and having a favorite grifter in this fuckhead industry is just too precious

[–] self@awful.systems 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

my bad, I was working on the awful.systems psychic energy collector and it must have backlashed

[–] self@awful.systems 9 points 3 months ago

this feels like a pattern too — so many naturally divergent or non-standard (from the perspective of a white American who thinks they own the English language) elements of writing are getting nonsensically trashjacketed as telltale signs that a text must be generated by an LLM. see also paully g trashjacketing “delve” for purely racist reasons and the authors of the Nix open letter having the accusation of LLM use leveled at them by people who didn’t read the letter and didn’t want anyone else to either.

[–] self@awful.systems 8 points 3 months ago

React has entered the chat (don’t try talking to it yet though, it has to “asynchronously” load every individual UI element in the jankiest way possible)

[–] self@awful.systems 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I ask for the dumbest things like “decrease the padding on the sidebar by half” because I’m too lazy to find it

this is so much slower (in both keystrokes and raw time, not to mention needing to re-prompt) and much more expensive than just going into the fucking CSS and pressing the 3 buttons needed to change the padding for that selector, and the only reason why this would ever be hard is because they’re knee deep in LLM generated slop and they can’t find fucking anything in there. what a fucking infuriating way to interact with a machine.

[–] self@awful.systems 18 points 3 months ago

it’s amazing how intensely these assholes want to end Wikipedia and pollute all other community information sources beyond repair. it feels like it’s all part of the same strategy:

  • without consent, scrape all the information from an online source as destructively as you can
  • if possible, render that source useless by polluting it with LLM crap
  • otherwise, shut it down through political means
  • now that you’ve pulled the ladder up behind you, replace that information source with your garbage LLM and start rentseeking harder than Netflix
[–] self@awful.systems 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It is not for those easily duped by what they find in their minds or online.

fuck I hate when my own brain dupes me into getting on the internet

view more: ‹ prev next ›