sp3ctr4l

joined 3 months ago
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

OMG what a shit take >=[

bad dum tish

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I was this close to also mentioning that yeah lol, turns out any guy can have pleasure and potentially an orgasm from proper prostate stimulation...

And you don't even have to be attracted to other dudes to be able to do that, and enjoy it!

Pegging and toys exist!

But again, nope, not allowed by heteronormativity.

To go with another personal anecdote... different girl I was dating at one time, who considered herself pansexual... well, I broached the idea of using an anal toy... and she, again I remind you, a self described pansexual... just started calling me gay, constantly made buttsex jokes and quips all the time, started trying to get me to hook up with dudes.

WTF?!

I respect her gender and sexual identity/preferences, she doesn't respect mine at all, while she's literally wearing rainbow flag pins and going to every pride event in town and constantly making IG posts about how everyone should be more inclusive and accepting?

Sorry to rant but yeah, the hypocrisy is strong and multifaceted in this realm.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Because they will be trained on what all of those people say, and then they will also make nonsense mistakes that don't even make sense according to that logic.

Kinda like how Trump has a fundamentally nonsensical economic policy, because he doesn't understand the underlying dynamics, he just knows the surface level rhetoric for a slew of policy positions, which when taken altogether at the same time, are mutually contradictory and inconsistent.

That'll be the level of logic you're plugging directly into the even more arcane and technically complex fields of large scale finance and accounting.

It would blow things up even faster, and from a more fundamental level.

We are already on the way to the dollar collapsing and the us defaulting on its debt.

Putting a bunch of overconfident, gaslighting autocorrect algos inside the fundamental workings of the finanical system would accelerate that process.

Please remember these LLMs hallucinate evidence and facts that are not real all the time, they have no capacity to reason nor analyze, they can only synthesize the average of whatever their algo determines is relevant to your input to them.

This could very easily lead to widespread, 0 trust in the reliability of any reported numbers or metrics of anything that uses LLMs, and generally speaking, when people lose confidence it the legitimacy of a financial organization's books... well that organization gets shorted, dumped, bank runs, etc.

Would you trust an LLM to manage your own monthly budget numbers and categorize things properly?

These things couldn't even figure out how many r's are in strawberry untill fairly recently.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Wait, what, you don't have a cloaca?

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (6 children)

Oh fuck, we are beyond fucked.

Yep, lets just hook up shitty LLMs to the world's financial system, what could possibly go wrong?!

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 weeks ago

That tip basically boils down to:

Use Japanese face models / voice actors who've been smoking for 20 years, rofl.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 weeks ago

I too am curious...

The first thing that popped into my head was the 'Paul is dead' conspiracy theory... that this was some image made for some conspiracy documentary about that...

???

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I was explaining why you likely consider them to have different taste profiles and thus think of them as incomparable, having cravings or desires for them in seperate mental categories.

There are similar differences between say, a McDonalds burger and fries, and burgers and fries from a local grill or pub or what not.

(Though, with burgers and fries, the fastfood versions generally still are generally cheaper, though that gap is closing fast in the US rn)

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I personally agree, but the vast majority of self described 'leftists' I've ever known in my life are:

  1. Actually liberals who only know how to cry and whine and complain and shift fault and blame

  2. So dismissive and ignorant of firearms, how they work, how shooting works, how tactics work, how logistics work, how opsec works...

That I would not even go to a gun range with them for fear of them accidentally shooting me, themself, or another person...

To say nothing of attempting an armed resistance.

...

I've never even met, in real life, a USAsian self described leftist thst I could convince to stop using tiktok, insta to live broadcast their entire life and current location and surroundings, and maybe use Signal instead.

Disconnecting from the corpo panopticon surveillance dragnet that is social media and computer/phone OS's that spy on you 24/7 is the most basic bare minimum prerequisite, and 99% of people can't even clear that bar.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Its because Taco Bell food is, as compared to a decent hole in the wall, or mexican food truck:

Higher in sodium.

Higher in carbohydrates.

Higher in saturated fat.

Good chance the tortilla/taco shell is also higher in corn syrup.

Also, good chance the hole in the wall uses a more varied selection of vegetables/peppers/pico de gallo, which augment flavor (and mouthfeel) without a high calorie sauce.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

They can, but Taco Bell food just is less healthy, and lately, broadly not even cheaper.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

https://www.forbes.com/sites/debgordon/2023/10/21/90-of-americans-feel-unprepared-by-sex-education-new-survey-shows/

I mean, the state of sex education in the US is abysmal, misinformation and just no information is so rampant that it's rather silly to expect the average young adult to know the detailed anatomic names.

In my life so far, I've dated plently of women who didn't know anatomical names, or with a few, even basic signs of what a vaginal health problem looks like.

With one, I had to deduce that her described urinary problems were possibly actually bacterial vaginosis when I uh, also noticed the smell.

She got extremely pissed off, thinking I was insulting her, thinking I was saying she had an STD/STI... a week later she's back from the doctor and yep, I was right, now she's on antibiotics.

How many women can, off the top of their head, identify the vas deferens, cowper's gland, or know that testicular torsion is even a thing?

view more: ‹ prev next ›