starrysonics

joined 2 days ago
[–] starrysonics@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago

I think they love musk and ceos like him. They're like the dancing monkeys of the business. The CEO becomes the lightning rod for public outcry against the company and causes short term dips in stock value which allows the share holders to buy more stock. Government contracts go through and they make money as the stock bounces back. There's other factors sure, but at the end of the day the share holders are still making money. They're running on a different system than the rest of us.

[–] starrysonics@lemmy.today 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Thier first mistake was using ridiculous levels of CGI on a film series that had been mostly practical effects until that point.

The 5th Indiana Jones is pretty okay in the first half and imo only starts to break when it references Indi's son to explain why he's not in the movie. From that point on it's a mixed bag.

Still, best practices is to act like there are only 3.

[–] starrysonics@lemmy.today 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yeah pretty much. See this is where it starts getting into money theory and I'm a few years out of my economics and finance classes.

But much like stocks and bonds currency swap also deals with interest and growth rates. It's a high-scale 'loan.' (But not technically a loan.) Loan-like.

It doesn't need paid back exactly but if one parties money becomes garbage then it does start to feel like a loan.

We are getting pesos in exchange, but again. The peso is risky. If it grows then you can argue we didn't loose any money. But we have to hold the pesos to help stabilize it's value.

[–] starrysonics@lemmy.today 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

So, I haven't been getting any answer here myself but in general here's what has been happening.

Aregentina's...idk president? Has been cutting their social program funding and regulation for the last year or two. It's wildly unpopular in his country.

Those cuts in regulation inflated their currency value for a bit but it was temporary.

Now, Aregentina is coming up on an election and the president is at risk of loosing and having his policies reversed.

So this money...it's not actually going anywhere or for anything specific. It's a currency swap. We are kind of giving them a loan. Just giving them money.

Because. Again. The Argentinian President cut tons of stuff and artificially inflated his currency with deregulation.

So Trump sending him money is like a bandaid to get him through his election.

He can point to this influx to show that "his policies are working." They're not. Argentina has had unstable currency for ages.

He's stealing from Peter to pay Paul.

But this is complicated money science and I can't explain in technical terms but that is the jist of it.

I mean, it could work. Javier Milei, The Argentinian President, is trying to get external investors to pump money into he economy so, if nothing else Trump giving him this money signals that he has America's support.

Argentinia also just had a big win with soybean contracts and China.

But in the short term he's essentially doubling down using a loan from his American pal.