stormdelay

joined 2 years ago
[–] stormdelay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh no not you again

[–] stormdelay@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

That's good to hear, good luck on your next space adventure!

[–] stormdelay@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I love TI. I'm currently playing an asynchrone game over discord, and a weekly "one round a night" game on TTPG. We've yet to try discordant stars but very possibly next game, how do you feel about it?

[–] stormdelay@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Authorities are investigating a possible link to drug trafficking, terrorism implies some sort of political revendication/objective which so far has not been the case

[–] stormdelay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That could still change, a number of the victims might still die from their wounds unfortunately

[–] stormdelay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My personal experience is that I just translate one idiom from one language / culture to the other without realising and still expect ppl. to know what I mean.

That often works in my experience, and can lead to funny moments

[–] stormdelay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

It's great, I have an asynchrone terraforming mars game running with some friends

[–] stormdelay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

Well apparently your spelling was perfectly fine, and neither of us were aware both spelling were acceptable, so we both learned something

[–] stormdelay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I didn't realize! I thought in this context lede was the only correct spelling, I suppose I should thank Cunningham's Law for learning something

[–] stormdelay@sh.itjust.works 46 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

(just fyi, it's "buried the lede")

[–] stormdelay@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

I'm not a lawyer (nor married), so my understanding is limited, but if both spouses agree to divorce (with or without agreeing on the exact conditions e.g. childcare), then that would constitute a no fault divorce. It seems to get messier if one spouse doesn't want to consent to the divorce, then the notion of fault starts appearing. And that's where my incomplete knowledge stops, both on the letter of the law and how it is applied in practice. The judge seems to have a lot of latitude as to whether the fault, if any, leads to consequences (financial reparations are a possibility).

[–] stormdelay@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 month ago (6 children)

You're of course correct in English, I just wanted to share that the currency sign goes after the value in many other languages, so it's an easy mistake for ESL people to make.

view more: next ›