the_toast_is_gone

joined 2 years ago
[–] the_toast_is_gone@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (4 children)

There's a YouTuber called The Rules Lawyer, and I thought at first this post was about him. It sounds like something he would do: "Every +1 Matters!"

[–] the_toast_is_gone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If an OSS project wants to thrive, it would behoove them to implement things that people want. I don't think there's a one-size-fits-all solution there, but they shouldn't be surprised if nobody wants to use their software because it doesn't do what they want.

[–] the_toast_is_gone@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

>make unpopular posts

>ban people for disagreeing with them

>people downvote your posts

>get mad

Get used to it, bub.

[–] the_toast_is_gone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

INFO: What is the case at hand?

[–] the_toast_is_gone@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Now that you mention it, I wouldn't be surprised if Japanese companies manufacture more cars in the US than US-based companies.

[–] the_toast_is_gone@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Hard agree, as an American. Honda and Toyota destroy our local companies in pretty much every regard other than maybe regulation dodging.

I had this idea for a wizard who was kind of crazy and believed he was the king of a nation that doesn't exist. He would see the rest of the party as his nobility and task them with enforcing laws he made up on the spot. In combat, he would use "control" type magic like paralysis and counterspells to lock down his enemies, pronounce guilty verdicts, and issue death sentences which his noble companions would carry out. I don't know if the spell list in D&D would support this kind of gameplay, though.

[–] the_toast_is_gone@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Call of Duty 1 was the first violent game my mom let me play. Good times.

[–] the_toast_is_gone@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

I've only lived in one apartment my whole life, but I wouldn't be surprised. Less need to interact means less interaction.

 

Schools shouldn't be treated as these magical places where you're put in at some age and over a decade later you emerge a complete human being. You have parents and you spend more time at home than at school for a reason: you're supposed to learn from your parents.

A school can potentially give you a degree of financial literacy instruction. Your parents should be the ones paying your allowance money and driving you to the bank to get your first checking account. A school can teach you how to cook something. Your parents should be the ones eating your food and helping you cook it better. A school can show you some level of DIY. Your parents should directly benefit from teaching you how to fix the sink when it gets clogged. A school can tell you what kinds of careers exist. Your parents should love you enough to tell you that either your career ambitions or your financial expectations need to change. A school can tell you how to build a resume. Your parents should be the ones driving you to your job interview and to your job until you buy your first car. A school can give you a failing grade when you do poorly on a test. Your parents should be able to make you face the real, in-the-moment consequences of doing something wrong.

Expecting a school, public or private, to teach you everything you need to know is a grave mistake. You need people in your corner who are taking an active part in raising you all the way to adulthood and beyond. If you have kids yourself, that goes for them as well. If you aren't there for your children, to teach them the things that schools don't teach because they can't mass produce the lessons to nearly the same quality that you can give them, they'll blame you and the school for having failed them. And they'd be right to lay the blame at your feet.

 
view more: next ›