unbanshee

joined 7 months ago
[–] unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

I switched a few months ago, and I've honestly been so impressed with how far Blender has come since the last time I tried it (more than 10 years ago, probably).

I don't work in creative industry anymore and I haven't had a ton of time to noodle around and actually try out the tools I've seen demo'd, but it was mindblowing discovering how many different software suites I had used to do stuff that Blender has been incorporating into their one package.

Maya? Obviously does most of that. ZBrush? Yep, pretty comparable. Marvelous Designer? Holy shit, yep. ToonBoom? Also that.

By far the worst part has just been trying to retrain hotkey muscle memory and learn minor (but fundamental) differences, and that's not as small a thing as a lot of people make it out to be - it does add a lot of cognitive noise and you really can't just hop in and flow right from the get go (depending on what you're doing).

Absolutely worth it to get away from Adobe though, and not having to bounce between programs while working on a model is very, very pleasant.

[–] unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

The challenge is convincing c-suite to greenlight the work.

[–] unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 weeks ago

Don't worry, I'm pretty sure that appeasement has historically gone really well.

[–] unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Mine's a cabinet minister 🤢

Like I'm emailing anyway but it's gonna be swiftly ignored.

[–] unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago

The Migrant Rights Network is currently hosting a petition drive against this bill, you can find it here: https://migrantrights.ca/equalitynotexclusion/

[–] unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No luck catching them moles then?

[–] unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

I took two years of Norwegian in university, and in my first-ever class, tthe prof, a lovely woman originally from Sweden, brought us cookies.

One girl didn't make it to the second class because sis could literally not say 'småkaker' without bursting into laughter.

 

Private clinics in Canada are selling access to personal health data without patients’ knowledge, according to a new study that says clients in the pharmaceutical industry are paying millions for this information.

“This is not how patients want their data to be used,” lead author Dr. Sheryl Spithoff told CTV’s Your Morning on Monday. “Patients are generally fine with sharing their data if it’s going to be used for research and health system improvement... but they’re very reluctant to have their data shared or held with for-profit companies.”

Spithoff is a family physician and scientist at Women’s College Hospital in Toronto, and an assistant professor at the University of Toronto. Published in the journal JAMA Network Open early this month, the new study focused on two unnamed health data companies that each had access to between one and two million patient records.

“The entities involved in the primary care medical record industry in Canada—chains of for-profit primary care clinics, physicians, commercial data brokers, and pharmaceutical companies—work together to convert patient medical records into commercial assets,” the study explains. “These assets are largely used to further the interests of the pharmaceutical companies.”

Spithoff’s research uncovered two models for how patient data is sold. In one, private clinics sell health information to a third-party commercial data broker that removes personal information before running analytics for the pharmaceutical industry. In another, private clinics are actually owned by a health data company that uses patient information to develop algorithms for pharmaceutical companies in order to identify and target patients with drug interventions.

In both cases, data is typically used without patients’ knowledge or consent.

“According to a data broker employee, no one sought consent from patients to access and use their records,” the study claims. “Instead, companies appeared to seek out physician consent to access patient records.”

Such practices, the study adds, “could potentially generate hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue.”

Spithoff says the study identified a number of risks with the monetization and sharing of patient data.

“One is that this is likely to give the pharmaceutical industry increased control over medical practices, so we’re likely to see more of a focus on expensive new on-patent drug,” Spithoff said. “We’re also very concerned about how the data are being used—anytime data are been shared, there’s privacy risks to patients.”

A physician interviewed for the study told researchers that patient data is “snatched away.”

“It’s patient’s data but how is it that these companies even can own the data?” the physician said, according to the study. “I don’t see how it should even be legal to provide this information."

[–] unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

BC has strata corporations, which are kiiiiind of the same thing based on my shitty surface-level understanding of HOAs.

And basically all multi-family housing has a strata.

[–] unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 months ago

Horrific, but fascinating.

[–] unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (14 children)

I'm not gonna engage with you beyond this since you're obviously uninterested in opinions other than your own, otherwise you might have looked at any of the studies I linked investigating weight-related stigma, which is related to others' kindness or lack thereof.

You're not fighting societal acceptance of obesity, you're just lazily perpetuating harmful social stigmas to justify your own discomfort with fat people.

You say it's not "normal" to be fat, but if a condition is considered epidemic, it's not really abnormal anymore, is it.

You don't know what that person eats. You don't know if that person has a medical disorder. You don't know if that person is disabled and unable to prepare healthy food for themselves. You don't know if that person has an eating disorder that they can't afford treatment for. You don't know if that person is on medications that affect their weight. You don't know if that's even a real person or an AI-generated image.

But you're real quick to diagnose the cause of their obesity as exclusively their personal failure for not eating the correct amount of the correct food.

It takes minutes to see what researchers are saying about this stuff.

Historically, the central dogma of the science of obesity has been that it is simply an energy balance disorder: calories in, calories out. If this energy-based model (EBM) of obesity, was true, then essentially exercising more and eating less should work for everyone. However, this is not the case. Many researchers believe that the pathophysiology of obesity is more complex.

While both social–environmental factors and genetic preposition have been recognized to play important roles in obesity epidemic, Gao et al. (2021) present evidence showing that epigenetic changes may be a key factor to explain interindividual differences in obesity.

Honestly there have been a few times recently where I've seen fat people doing or saying interesting things online, and half the fucking comments are vitriol about their weight and how it reflects on their character, as though that overshadows and invalidates anything they're doing. And sometimes I see other commenters challenging these views, and sometimes the hate commenters will backpedal of they realize that the person they're discussing has what the consider to be a valid medical excuse.

I'm autistic and ADHD, and to me, that kind of behaviour is a reflection of what goes on in places like fakedisordercringe, where they claim to respect people with official diagnoses but never bother to actually see which of their targets has an official diagnosis, or consider that the absence of a formal diagnosis doesn't mean the absence of the condition. And that's because it's not actually about the underlying reasons for the behavior they're mocking, because they don't care about those reasons. They'd rather not know if there's a diagnosis that would exclude their target from mockery because how their target is acting makes them uncomfortable.

It's a way of enforcing conformity through cruelty, just like bullying fat people.

And I've read stuff like this piece, with the line "I wish I didn’t have to justify myself, or base my worth on proving that I’m trying.", and I see myself in that. I've burned myself out multiple times and seriously damaged my physical and mental health as a result of trying to act like I'm neurotypical.

I'm fucking tired of seeing anybody get judged as moral deficients online by people who know nothing about them or their histories.

[–] unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 2 months ago (18 children)

I mean, that's nice for you, but the difference is that that teasing was coming from the friends, and not internet randos who neither know nor care about you.

Next to nobody who sees that screenshot knows the person in the photo, or whether they're even able to lose weight by "putting in the work".

Also, there's a preponderance of evidence that your case is an outlier, and "teasing" does not improve the lives of its targets.

You never know what somebody is going through, and it costs nothing to be kind.

view more: next ›