The reason that the rich were so rich, Vimes reasoned, was because they managed to spend less money. Take boots, for example. ... A really good pair of leather boots cost fifty dollars. But an affordable pair of boots, which were sort of OK for a season or two and then leaked like hell when the cardboard gave out, cost about ten dollars. ... But the thing was that good boots lasted for years and years. A man who could afford fifty dollars had a pair of boots that'd still be keeping his feet dry in ten years' time, while a poor man who could only afford cheap boots would have spent a hundred dollars on boots in the same time and would still have wet feet. This was the Captain Samuel Vimes 'Boots' theory of socio-economic unfairness. (Terry Pratchett, Men at Arms)
underline960
Culturally sensitive depiction of... what exactly? Knowing nothing, I see a person with a laser sword and a gargoyle.
Source: Solo Leveling(?)
I'm guessing based on the art style.
Fair enough. I get overwhelmed by all the ethical questions that come with being in the real world.
My partner outsourced most of that mental work and focused on trying to be a good person from moment to moment. I think she would've broadly agreed with you from a karma standpoint.
It looks you're coming at this in bad faith, so I'll ignore you.
For anyone else reading, the CIA version basically revises "brutal dictator" to "brutal 'captain of a team'."
As long as they punch down and kiss up to the right people, assholes can usually reduce "tit for tat" to "tit for slap-on-the-wrist".
I agree you that they are more likely than not to produce a suboptimal future.
I just disagree with the premise that "winning less" is the same as tit for tat.
Tell me if I'm wrong, but I think tit for tat was written from the perspective of nation vs nation decision-making.
It assumes you have roughly equivalent power, i.e. person vs person or business vs business.
I don't think it applies in person vs boss, or mom 'n pop shop vs international conglomerate.
OP's saying that neoliberals and the CIA were/are contradicting each other, not that Stalin was a good guy.
I was going to say The Matrix was ackshually a closeted trans allegory, but it turns out it's both (but also, whatever you want it to be, kinda).
Source: Kowloon Generic Romance?
What is TBATE?
Well that's a rude thing to say to your... girlfriend?