villasv

The real solution here is to educate people about the importance of helmets and about the importance of other safety measures such as safe cycling practices.

So the real solution to cyclists getting run over is teaching cyclists about safety?

I'm not against teaching the importance of helmet and cycling safely - I think those are relevant ingredients - but this is FAR far away from a real solution.

Yeah, I know. It goes from “impossible luxury” to “barely affordable” as you go from downtown towards the edges of the metro region. Just saying that it’s not surprising for Vancouver that those prices are so jacked up.

Detached homes shouldn’t even exist in Vancouver metrocore anymore so, it makes sense to be a fortune

I can't say for sure if it's exactly the same, but I'd say it's very close to what you get filtering for highway=cycleway

AAA = All-Ages-and-Abilities. In Vancouver it almost always is a protected bike path, but in theory it also includes off street bicycle paths (like the Stanley Park seawall, I think). Meaning, the really nice lanes.

Tried brouter, really liked it! The no-go circles is way faster than adding hundreds of "Avoid road" markers on OsmAnd! Thanks :-)

Edit: spent two hours customizing BRouter's routing algorithms with my own cost factors based on OSM cycling related tags, it's now working like a charm without me having to put a single no-go zone! Thanks again for the recommendation!

Strava helps because I can easily see which paths have lots of traffic and those tend to be AAA or similar, but it doesn't do much more than adding the CyclOSM overlay in OsmAnd. And while I really dig the Route creation & mgmt, that's mostly useful after I already know the route I need. I'll take a look at Komoot and ORS, thanks.

Edit: ORS already got major points for having the CyclOSM layer as well! Still, it doesn't allow me to prioritize AAA routes :-/

Really cool. I’d host some if not for some very personal reasons, but I’ll take a look at the repo and see if there’s something I can contribute.

archive.is is privately funded by its owners, while archive.org is a registered non-profit. They are not the same.

I guess that should also translate into possibly higher prices for the Mac Pro/Studio line? Or not? I don't really know, but not worrying about GPU prices feels nice.

Cool, I guess. I've been playing Diablo IV on my Mac at pretty decent performance thanks to their new portability kit. I was very close to getting a steamdeck and now I'm sure I don't need one to have some gaming in my life apart from the time-killers in my phone.

I think "cool"