wolfyvegan

joined 1 month ago
MODERATOR OF
 

archived (Wayback Machine)

 

archived (Wayback Machine)

 

The open-access paper is here (webpage) or here (PDF)

archived webpage and PDF (Wayback Machine)

 

Coral reefs around the world have been subjected to unprecedented heat stress since early 2023. A new report finds heat-related coral bleaching has damaged corals in more than 80 countries, making it the most extensive bleaching event ever recorded, with no clear end in sight.

Between January 2023 and April 2025, heat stress impacted 84% of coral reefs worldwide, from the Mesoamerican Reef in the Caribbean to so-called supercorals in the Red Sea, an area previously believed to be resilient to damage caused by extreme temperatures.

archived article (Wayback Machine)

report cited (Wayback Machine)

 

Hydrogen has long been hyped as the “Swiss army knife” of the energy transition, but today – despite billions in investment – it largely remains limited to niche industrial applications.

In a new review article, published in Nature Reviews Clean Technology, we look at where hydrogen could plausibly become competitive – and the applications where it is unlikely to ever be a viable solution.

For each use case, the review looks at the cost and carbon emissions of using hydrogen relative to alternative solutions, identifying the barriers which stand in the way of uptake.

For example, high-profile applications, such as home heating and fuelling cars, are still widely promoted, but are failing to take off.

Fundamentally, this is because hydrogen is an inefficient and costly option in these cases, with Ferraris globally outselling all makes of hydrogen fuel-cell cars combined.

Finally, the review looks at the current state of government hydrogen policy around the world, plus the ways that its potential could be maximised in the future.

archived (Wayback Machine)

 

Hydrogen has long been hyped as the “Swiss army knife” of the energy transition, but today – despite billions in investment – it largely remains limited to niche industrial applications.

In a new review article, published in Nature Reviews Clean Technology, we look at where hydrogen could plausibly become competitive – and the applications where it is unlikely to ever be a viable solution.

For each use case, the review looks at the cost and carbon emissions of using hydrogen relative to alternative solutions, identifying the barriers which stand in the way of uptake.

For example, high-profile applications, such as home heating and fuelling cars, are still widely promoted, but are failing to take off.

Fundamentally, this is because hydrogen is an inefficient and costly option in these cases, with Ferraris globally outselling all makes of hydrogen fuel-cell cars combined.

Finally, the review looks at the current state of government hydrogen policy around the world, plus the ways that its potential could be maximised in the future.

archived (Wayback Machine)

 

There was a time when an ecologist’s education was not complete without the mud of a marsh on their boots or the scent of damp earth after a rainforest downpour. Increasingly, however, the discipline is moving indoors. A paper published in Trends in Ecology & Evolution by Masashi Soga and Kevin J. Gaston highlights a disconcerting trend: the decline of fieldwork in ecological research and education.

archived (Wayback Machine)

 

Agroforestry is recognized as a way to boost local biodiversity, improve soils and diversify farming incomes. New research suggests it may also benefit nearby forests by reducing pressure to clear them.

The study found agroforestry has helped reduce deforestation across Southeast Asia by an estimated 250,319 hectares (618,552 acres) per year between 2015 and 2023, lowering emissions and underscoring its potential as a natural climate solution.

However, the findings also indicate agroforestry worsened deforestation in many parts of the region, highlighting a nuanced bigger picture that experts say must be heeded.

Local social, economic and ecological factors are pivotal in determining whether agroforestry’s impacts on nearby forests will be positive or negative, the authors say, and will depend on the prevalence of supportive policies.

archived (Wayback Machine)

 

Agroforestry is recognized as a way to boost local biodiversity, improve soils and diversify farming incomes. New research suggests it may also benefit nearby forests by reducing pressure to clear them.

The study found agroforestry has helped reduce deforestation across Southeast Asia by an estimated 250,319 hectares (618,552 acres) per year between 2015 and 2023, lowering emissions and underscoring its potential as a natural climate solution.

However, the findings also indicate agroforestry worsened deforestation in many parts of the region, highlighting a nuanced bigger picture that experts say must be heeded.

Local social, economic and ecological factors are pivotal in determining whether agroforestry’s impacts on nearby forests will be positive or negative, the authors say, and will depend on the prevalence of supportive policies.

archived (Wayback Machine)

[–] wolfyvegan@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago

One would think that far-right free-market people would at least make the point about supply and demand; if the people stop buying it, the businesses will stop doing it. Alas, it seems that the majority (of the loud voices in the news) still prefer to downplay or deny the environmental crisis altogether.

[–] wolfyvegan@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well, that'll do it. Thanks! Whether that's what the author meant is another question...

[–] wolfyvegan@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
[–] wolfyvegan@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago

"fruit trees, native trees, and other beneficial vegetation"

Seems likely. Even just "native trees" would almost need to include Inga species, which are legumes, and there are native Amazon nuts like Caryodendron orinocense that might also grow wild in the area.

[–] wolfyvegan@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] wolfyvegan@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

But even just considering carbon emissions, which have reduced in intensity

Anyone have a source to support that claim? It sounds like something that could be true on a per-capita basis, at least in "developed countries" over a cherry-picked time interval.

[–] wolfyvegan@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They are reforesting monoculture farms and cow pasture. Given the choice between a very disturbed ecosystem full of a mix of native and "invasive" non-native trees or a very disturbed ecosystem full of nothing but invasive African grass that smothers other vegetation and impedes natural regeneration of the forest, I'd choose the trees any day. Considering the severity of the environmental crisis in the Amazon especially, and considering how much of it is due to animal agriculture and cattle grazing in particular, I'd go so far as to say that ANY vegetation is better than cow pasture.

If the people reclaiming the land from animal agriculture are going to eat, then they can either a) employ agroforestry methods in order to grow food and plant trees on deforested land at the same time; or b) allow total natural regeneration of 100% of their land and buy food grown by industrial agriculture that deforested land somewhere else and quite possibly poisoned the soil and water with -icides and then burned diesel fuel in order to harvest and transport the food.

Unless and until humans cease to exist on this planet, they will have some amount of environmental impact. Criticising vegans who are doing the best that they can to live peacefully and sustainably is not the most productive use of time and energy.

(That said, I can appreciate your concern for the ecological balance of the forest. Forest ecology is highly complex, and realistically, I don't think that any human intervention can achieve the same diversity and functional benefits of a pristine old-growth forest.)

[–] wolfyvegan@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago

Let's all remember that while jet aircraft emit much more than other forms of transportation, this is nothing compared to the emissions of animal agriculture.

view more: ‹ prev next ›