@fediverse @atomicpoet Yep! Majority of them are questionable, even those who claim they were "manually" verified by some supposedly "well-known" person. Even in the ATmosphere network, it's the same.
youronlyone
joined 2 months ago
@fediverse @atomicpoet Yep! Majority of them are questionable, even those who claim they were "manually" verified by some supposedly "well-known" person. Even in the ATmosphere network, it's the same.
If you're a content creator:
If you're a content consumer:
A. Use whichever software, platform, server, community, service, and/or app you prefer
B. Follow the people you want to follow regardless of which software, platform, etc. they are on
C. You don't have to create-yet-another-account
Of course, for content creators, they prefer to use different platforms for specific purposes and features. So, they still will end up with multiple accounts. However, №2 and №3 still applies to them.
And for the content consumers, it won't matter, just follow all the other accounts of the content creator they like using one account.
That's how it works for most.
If we put it into context.
In #Instagram, many "influencers" report and ban followers who:
These "influencers" assume their followers are inactive, useless, or accounts meant for scamming and spamming them later. They don't care if your are a legitimate fan, even a donator, who created-yet-another-account just to follow them.
With the Fediverse, and any #OpenSocial / #OpenSocialWeb / #SocialWeb network for that matter, it solves that problem. "Influencers" can have silly criteria all they want without risking kicking out legitimate fans because their fans are more likely using an account regularly because it's their "main" account, not yet-another-account.
@atomicpoet @fediverse @Coolmccool @jwcph