this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2025
81 points (97.6% liked)

News

25286 readers
3731 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Tennessee lawmakers approved a major school voucher expansion, allowing 20,000 students—regardless of income—to use taxpayer funds for private schools.

Backed by Gov. Bill Lee and Donald Trump, the plan redirects $400 million in education funds, despite concerns it benefits wealthy families and weakens public schools.

Critics argue most vouchers will go to students already in private schools, and private institutions can reject disabled students.

Protesters and school boards opposed the bill, but GOP leaders defended it as expanding parental choice. The bill now awaits Lee’s signature.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] macaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Tennessee Government: We can’t have a living wage. Also Tennessee Government: Here’s money to put kids through private school.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It costs the same to the government, so fiscally it is a wash

[–] pwnicholson@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Educational funding in most of the USA works a bit like insurance and/or a healthy social system. Everyone pays in based on their means - creates a pool of resources - then kids get assistance/education based on needs.

The trick here is that a lot of the kids with the most need are from families with the least means. So if the ratio of kids who need extra help/resources goes up because rich families all pull their kids out, then the schools won't have enough funding to cover the needs of the kids that are left.

That's exacerbated by the fact that schools in most of the USA (and definitely TN: I live in Nashville) are woefully underfunded, and rely in fundraisers and parent support groups to fill the gap in funding so teachers can have even basic supplies. Again, if most of the affluent families leave, there will be fewer parents of means there to help fill the gap.

It's another example of rich families wanting to be able to opt out of helping poor ones.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The costs to educate 2 million students is double that of 1 million students. You can't just double class sizes when you have more teachers. You need new classrooms and teachers when you have more students.

So per student you need roughly a constant amount of money. Any student that goes to a private school doesn't cost the public system money. If you give what they cost to a private school it's a wash fiscally

[–] pwnicholson@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If every student needed the same amount of support, that would be correct. But that is not the case.

Public school districts are required by law to provide whatever is needed for a student's education. That even includes some students beyond the age of 18.

That includes everything from academically gifted students to English language learners to special needs students who require full time, 1x1 caregivers. I've personally worked as a substitute teacher in some of those special needs classes.

All of those specially educators and the facilities needed all cost more than an average general education kindergarten teacher.

When parents of kids who are average of slightly above average and don't have a lot of special needs (read: often the more affluent families) pull their kids out, the ratio of kids with more meds changes.

Again, that extra support is required by laws passed by this same Tennessee legislature.

And you also ignored the issue of voluntary parent fundraising they is the lifeblood of many schools. That's a massive gap that is made worse when affluent families pull their kids out.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

So what percentage more are we talking? 1% or more like 10% more?