this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
377 points (99.0% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

36884 readers
500 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"Ads keep our content free to you to enjoy, please allow ads."

** Allowing ads to the site **

LOL!! You fell for it!!! You need to subscribe too, LOL!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] archonet@lemy.lol 49 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (17 children)

see, I don't negotiate with terrorists, so I use PopUpOFF and Bypass Paywalls Clean. Also AdNauseam, TrackMeNot, CanvasBlocker, and SponsorBlock to round out the "fuck you, fuck your ads, and fuck your tracking" suite.

Hostile consumer practices becoming ubiquitous? Become a hostile consumer.

[–] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 17 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

Calling a news site terrorist for asking for payment for the articles they write in the current political landscape sounds so.. first-world-problems.

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 hours ago

It was probably an entertaining exaggeration, but I don't like how the term is being diluted by overuse. If a mosquito bites me, it's a terrorist. Got a stone in your shoe? Believe it or not: Terrorist.

The term has serious legal consequences in many countries, therefore we should make sure people don't forget what its true meaning is.

[–] xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Running malware on someone else’s computer does not exactly make you the good one.

[–] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world -5 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Big reach from running ads to it being malware

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 13 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world -2 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I didn't say ads can't contain malware, but it's a bit of a "(some) internet malware is ads, but not all ads are malware" scenario, it's very dependent on who they get the ads from and how tight those ads get reviewed. Broad statements like that are just ignorant, and I say that as someone who uses an adblock on all of their devices.

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

“…and how tight those ads get reviewed”

Websites that serve ads don’t review them ESPECIALLY if those ads are coming from third parties.

[–] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world -1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I know dummy, I meant the ad supplying platforms reviewing them

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 1 points 7 minutes ago

They don’t review them either and let’s not resort to name calling.

(some) internet malware is ads, but not all ads are malware

That's backwards. (Most) ads are malware, but not all malware is ads.

The majority of ads are, at best, dangerous and, at worst, actively malicious. The ad networks don't care to review them because they make money either way.

The overwhelming majority of ads are malware. Which is why I block aggressively and refuse to budge on that.

[–] IceFoxX@lemm.ee 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

*the articles they copied somewhere else

[–] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] IceFoxX@lemm.ee 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Based on the fact that I haven't lived under a rock for the last 10-20 years. The more the internet expanded the more sources there were to copy from and since then it has increased greatly. Sometimes you only need to search the headline and you'll find several "sources" < I mean in general and not related to the article

[–] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

That's just arguing in bad faith, unless you can at least demonstrate that this particular journal has copied their articles in the past.

Even if you were to entertain that thought however it doesn't make them any more guilty of "terrorism" like op called them

[–] IceFoxX@lemm.ee 2 points 7 hours ago

I did not respond to the OP's statement. I merely corrected your statement, as an extremely large number of articles are copied from somewhere these days. Which is absolutely no secret. International articles that are then chased through a translator and then published without being read. including nonsense from the translator.

The terrorizing then takes place later with copyrights etc. between publishers and the public. Yes, DRM is already terrorizing

load more comments (13 replies)