JustARaccoon

I didn't say ads can't contain malware, but it's a bit of a "(some) internet malware is ads, but not all ads are malware" scenario, it's very dependent on who they get the ads from and how tight those ads get reviewed. Broad statements like that are just ignorant, and I say that as someone who uses an adblock on all of their devices.

That's just arguing in bad faith, unless you can at least demonstrate that this particular journal has copied their articles in the past.

Even if you were to entertain that thought however it doesn't make them any more guilty of "terrorism" like op called them

Saying that based on..?

Hahahahaha no

Calling a news site terrorist for asking for payment for the articles they write in the current political landscape sounds so.. first-world-problems.

There's lots of types, think even stuff like d&d monster blocks, or custom date ones

The "world police" issue is when America gets involved uninvited and clearly with ulterior motives. This is an entirely different situation

I said it renames the part the US controls, this argument of renaming the entire thing is a figment of your imagination, or you're replying to the wrong message. Replace "renamed" with "named" in my sentence and then you have no leg to stand on. Your example is stupid, china is not "a part the US controls", please do not engage in replying to my comments if you're just going to strawman me.

That's literally what I said my dude, you're just arguing semantics over the use of "renaming"

Actually the executive order only renames the parts that the US controls, and they don't control the entire gulf

IP address, same way they decide what language to show the names in