this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2025
357 points (97.6% liked)

World News

41275 readers
3785 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

A couple on a Qatar Airways flight from Melbourne to Doha was forced to sit next to a deceased passenger for four hours after she collapsed and died mid-flight.

The flight crew moved the woman’s body to an empty seat beside them and denied their request to change seats.

Qatar Airways apologized but did not offer the couple support after the incident.

The couple, en route to Venice, criticized the airline’s handling of the situation but are trying to continue their trip despite the distressing experience.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 139 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (11 children)

Poll:

Would you rather sit next to a dead person or a crying baby for 4 hours on a plane?

Personally, I'd take the dead person.

[–] Boxscape@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 7 hours ago

Personally, I'd take the dead person.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

dead bodies sometimes shit or urinate themselves. and your just being hotboxed in a plane.

[–] Feelfold@lemm.ee 10 points 7 hours ago

Babies shit and piss themselves constantly.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Is there an option to turn even more of the other passengers into bodies?

Wait! No, don't put me on the list -

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I hate that your offer is appealing. But only briefly -- the baby was never going to win.

I rather sit next to a baby than half the people on flights

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 115 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

Keep in mind, dead people evacuate their bowels. It's not a mummy type situation, but more of a sitting next to an open, used by concert goers, porta potty situation.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 9 hours ago

I mean, only sometimes. Stuff kind of comes out of bodies at it's own pace.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 36 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

So do babies. At least the dead person just stinks and isn't also screaming.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 48 points 20 hours ago (2 children)
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 hours ago

Baby shit =/= Adult shit

For the parents, no.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 15 points 19 hours ago

Plus they're easily cleaned and changed.

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago

I have bad news for you about babies. And many people make sure to fully evacuate before a flight because they will do anything to avoid that bathroom.

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

At least this one had the courtesy to go to the toilet first

[–] kinther@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

Damn it, I'll take the corpse

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 26 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

A baby is annoying, but they can't really help it. I can blame the parents for bringing a baby on a long flight, but I can't get mad at that shit.

Kids on the other hand. I once had 4 unruly kids sitting on the row behind me and they were insane. It was a relatively short flight (6 hours), so a smaller plane with those really thin seats. The plane had the 3-3 configuration of seats, so mom, dad and the 4 kids took up the entire row.

The kids were between 4 and 12 years old. Dad was in the corner sleeping, not giving a fuck. The two older kids (12 and 9 I think) were playing their Switches on the other side of the aisle next to dad. The two younger kids (4 and 7) were behind me with mom. Mom was in the corner with the smallest kid and they were wild. The 7 year old was constantly smashing against their tray and thus my back, kept kicking directly against my back and screaming all the time. The smallest alternated between laughing loudly and crying (shrieking more like). The smallest also stood on the tray, grabbing at my seat and head, diving in between the seat screaming PEEKABOO at full volume directly in my ear. The smallest one would also like to run in the aisle or visit the other kids, but the other one didn't want to move so the kid snuck in between the other one and my seat.

Mom was trying, but 4 kids on your own is a big ask. About 20 mins before we landed the two younger ones passed out and they were pretty damned cute. But in the end my back hurt, I was exhausted and deaf in one ear.

The annoying part was, the rest of the plane was filled with old people who didn't make a peep all flight, just sat there and read, listened and slept. But we just had to be in the worst place on the plane. Sitting behind kids may be annoying, but at least they don't use your back as a punching bag like when you sit in front of them.

[–] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 1 points 5 hours ago

The smallest also stood on the tray, grabbing at my seat and head, diving in between the seat screaming PEEKABOO at full volume directly in my ear.

I would've grabbed the kids arm and traumatised him for life

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 34 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

A baby is annoying, but they can't really help it.

I doubt the dead person had much control of the situation either.

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Sometimes I am reminded of a book I read as a kid wherein one of the main characters dies and is eventually resurrected. She says that when you die, you don't lose awareness or move on, you just passively occupy the body without the ability to move (like locked-in syndrome, I guess, but I didn't know that as a kid and don't know whether it was even recognized back then). In particular she describes the horrors of her autopsy.

If that were true, I wonder whether the person within the cadaver would be embarrassed to have caused such inconvenience. I know I would.

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 7 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

100% the dead person. I'd rather jump than stay next to the baby.

[–] supercriticalcheese@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

Right, sure ...