this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2025
885 points (99.7% liked)

politics

20438 readers
2654 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Twenty-one staffers from Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) resigned, citing ethical concerns over dismantling public services and compromising sensitive data.

Formerly part of the U.S. Digital Service, they criticized Musk and Trump’s overhaul, which included layoffs and politically charged interviews.

Their letter warned that removing skilled technologists endangers essential services like Social Security and veterans’ benefits.

The resignations add to growing concerns over Musk’s aggressive federal cuts, amplified by his recent CPAC speech where he symbolically wielded a chainsaw against "bureaucracy."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 160 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I am always confused why they don't just sabotage the efforts? Like it would be so easy and they definitely aren't paying attention...

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

One aspect is that working in that kind of system destroys your mental health. Having to play games to hide the good things, trying to mitigate the bad things. It’s pressure.

My state has been basically been doing Project 2025 for the past five years. I had a friend in an important position in a fascist overtaken state organization who held on for a long time, fighting the good fight - but it drains. She fought her fucking hardest, but a human being can only fight for so long.

[–] Makhno@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The kurds have been fighting a war from the desert for decades, but Americans get whipped by paperwork and call it a day

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well, we can’t shoot our fascists yet. It would probably be pretty helpful with the mental health part.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

At the very least it'd be cathartic, plus humans are wired for killing more than paperwork. See problem smash problem is a lot more immediate than slow boring paperwork

[–] in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

plus humans are wired for killing more than paperwork

A common misconception, and anti-scientific one at that, often postulated by white supremacists that point at chimps in the jungle and say "That's where our nature/culture comes from." Humans are social creatures, we suck at speed/strength/endurance/lethality compared to most animals on earth because we're less hardwired for violence than we are for social abilities. Yes, while our fists are shaped to maximize damage to human faces, and human faces are shaped to minimize damage from human fists, that's a far less unique human attribute than our brains. That's why you don't see male chimps writing poetry and songs to court a female chimp that builds orbital satellites while doing a physics PhD.

Humans beings are far and beyond more wired than anything else to sit around a fire and solve problems with eachother through abstract reasoning while sharing food. That and husband/wife swapping (i'm speaking strictly from anthropological data that made my own preconceived biases go "huh?")

[–] Ragnor 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Actually, our endurance is one of the best in nature. Most animals would overheat if forced to keep up with us over long distances. Here is a source confirming it.

[–] in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

Okay then add 'sweating' to the list of human traits more engrained than violence.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We actually shot him once. But he survived

[–] in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago

I feel like there will be a "How To Count To 10 In American" video coming out in the next 4-8 years.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 142 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Different people are able to take on different levels of risk.

Just because these people resigned doesn’t mean that some other people aren’t staying in for the purposes of being subversive, and you shouldn’t ever hear about the latter.

[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's the thing, though. They're not really taking risks.

Much of what DOGE does is completely illegal and does not go through the proper channels and processes. By simply doing their jobs and forcing everything through the proper processes, they can slow down everything, maybe even to a halt, while being completely in the right and thus can't be fired.

Yes, it takes a mental toll, but these guys have a responsibility.

[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They're unemployed government workers, there are less government jobs now than ever, and their resume literally says DOGE on it. They are taking a risk.

[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No. They resigned from a job. They were not fired. And as long as they don't break any rules, it's hard to fire them.

[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I never said they were fired, but since you brought it up, when you're fired, you'll usually get a severance to help during the job search, they won't, they're just unemployed.

[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

... because they resigned. Seriously, what's your point?

If they wouldn't have resigned, they would still have a job. And since they couldn't have been fired easily, they would have continued to have a job for quite a while.

That's not a complex concept, what's so hard to understand about that?

[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

They resigned from a job they believed was wrong, which will lead to substantial financial consequences for them. You tried to dismiss their efforts as if it was nothing, so I called you out for being dismissive. You say "Seriously, what's your point?" As if I'm the one making provocative statements from the sidelines.

[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org -2 points 10 hours ago

Yes, because you're completely missing the point.

There is literally no risk involved for them in just staying. They had their jobs, and they could easily do the right thing by just following the law. If they were to be fired, they would still get severance of some sort. In any case, it would have slowed down Elon at least for a while.

What they did instead is resigning, thus not getting severance, not being able to slow anything down, making room for obedient bootlickers, and finally they're now unemployed.

So tell me again: how is resigning the right move? They made the world worse, and they made their personal life worse. Literally no benefit for anyone.

Your entire argument is ex post. You see the fact that they resigned as a given and try to justify that. Why can't you see that this is not a necessary condition?

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 60 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Sabatoge can carry extremely harsh legal penalties, particularly if it has any type of lasting impact. Beyond that, just phoning it in and doing a bad job can slow things down but doesn't actually stop it. If you're then let go it's on their pace, it looks worse for you and it's less noticeable.

A mass resignation can be the only thing some people can do. It sends a message, it gets noticed outside the organization, and it lets objective news reporting share your motivation, which would normally fall under opinion.
It also leaves a big gap in the organization that isn't getting anything done.

[–] littlewonder@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Can't persecute you for sabotage if it just happens to coincide with proper office protocol.

Simple Sabotage Field Manual

[–] crawancon@lemm.ee 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

but.. he who saves his country can not break the law. right??!

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Guys, dumping tea in the harbor is illegal, just pay your taxes to the crown. It's just a king, everyone has one

[–] RippleEffect@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

The American revolutionary war was difficult enough with an entire ocean separating us from a king. Now the self appointed king is here.

[–] bufalo1973@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

Not if you make an Italian strike. You are following every single step of the process, taking the time needed, all by the book. And when the higher rank says something then everyone working resigns all at once.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Mostly the risk of jail, probably.

[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Or stochastic terrorism