this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2025
811 points (99.6% liked)

politics

20438 readers
2700 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Twenty-one staffers from Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) resigned, citing ethical concerns over dismantling public services and compromising sensitive data.

Formerly part of the U.S. Digital Service, they criticized Musk and Trump’s overhaul, which included layoffs and politically charged interviews.

Their letter warned that removing skilled technologists endangers essential services like Social Security and veterans’ benefits.

The resignations add to growing concerns over Musk’s aggressive federal cuts, amplified by his recent CPAC speech where he symbolically wielded a chainsaw against "bureaucracy."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JollyBrancher@lemm.ee 4 points 10 hours ago

It's really no surprise to anyone who's followed the current state of things. The Department of Government Excrement. I only hope a heinous and abhorrently-wild remainder of life to those who have cheered for the dismantling of the institution previously. I say dismantling, because most people are influenced by any end game prospect or "promises" than the actual process. If you still believed the process could somehow work, with changes rather than taking a hammer, I still think the intentions were wildly misguided at worst. However, if you truly wanted near (if not full) fascist rule, and thought it would lead to the "greater good" with what we have now, I hope you realize it will only ever be for the good of the wealthy until millions - and that especially you yourself suffer. I get that is easy to be swept up in the rhetoric. Americans are (or at least we were 10+ years ago) taught from a young age that trust and commitment to the government will lead to helping the general public. It's especially a shame that the most self-sufficient US agency (the National Park Service) was touched at all. But I guess that government handouts for exploitative employers (business tax benefits/reliefs) sounds sexier. Even if they remove chunks of the most truly efficient government entity. The DoD? Keeping the ones they love safe - even at home far from most international conflict. Civil service? It's not sexy, but if you want to truly help - or improve what the federal government offers and also learn to to better - you will be fine.

By now, hopefully a majority of people agree the most wasteful and damaging agency is the current one believing it can cut without consequence.

[–] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 69 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Holy shit you guys are proper fucked. America went full retard

[–] minkymunkey_7_7@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago

You ain't seen nuthin yet!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 18 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

In their resignation letter, the former USDS staffers recounted how they were interviewed the day after Trump’s inauguration by figures wearing White House visitors’ badges who “demonstrated limited technical ability.”

“Several of these interviewers refused to identify themselves, asked questions about political loyalty, attempted to pit colleagues against each other,” the workers, all of whom previously worked at tech companies such as Google and Amazon, recounted. “This process created significant security risks.”

Forty USDS staffers were laid off following these interviews as part of Trump and Musk’s ongoing slashing of the federal government’s workforce. Around 65 remaining workers were then incorporated into DOGE, 21 of whom have now resigned from their positions.

Well thats 44 assholes

[–] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 1 points 20 minutes ago

Or 44 minus a few people sabotaging things.

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

I would love to see posts like this end up on right leaning spaces like critical posts about left leaning issues end up on left leaning spaces.

Trumps base has such a sycophant army that they just swarm spaces and post this stuff every minute of every day. But the opposite doesn't happen. Having even 100 people posting stuff like this across their space would do more than a 10 000 person protest ever could but it amazes me that 10 000 would take time off work, go stand in the rain for a week instead of shit posting effectively.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, but right leaning spaces block people critical of the right. Just look at the cesspool that is /r/conservative

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world -1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

So does left spaces but they get through by their conviction to have every random base member spread it. The left is literally asleep

[–] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 13 points 21 hours ago

This is based on the faulty liberal assumption that fascists are only fascists because they have yet to be shown all of the facts and logic.

Let's just speed run the scenario where you post this article on a right space: you post the article, every trumper comes out and says the resignations were good because the staffers were woke, and then you scratch your head wondering why your appeal to facts and logic didn't work on fascists. At this point you might just start spamming right spaces and have all your posts go directly to spam.

It's honestly kind of disturbing how you write off actual protests in favor of online activism, and I couldn't think of a more liberal take tbh. Anyone, at this stage of the game, who is taking the position of "less protests, more..." should be evaluated extremely critically - especially if your alternative is spamming r/conservative with liberal thinkpieces.

[–] LotrOrc@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

If all people did was post things online then there is no chance in hell anything would change.

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

Literally everything has changed with shit posting.

[–] Seasm0ke@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago

That was trumps entire campaign strategy. Dems mocked them for their online spend and now look. GamerGate, YouTube ads, Swarmfront and 4Chan have shaped the internet discourse to be right leaning on nearly every popular platform. I hate to admit it but shitposting did created change. The alt right pipeline radicalized young men into trump voters.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Be the change you want to see

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 97 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (17 children)

Relevant bit from the article, because some of y'all apparently comment before reading:

The staffers who resigned were all originally employees of the United States Digital Service, a technology unit established during President Obama’s second term in 2014. The unit was renamed and reorganized in January via executive order by Trump into the Musk-headed DOGE.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 day ago

My understanding is: Founding a new Department can only be done by Congress, so they had to "redefine" (more like corrupt) an existing one.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago

I have seen some news sites giving this with headlines like "DOGE Goons resign" without the part you just quoted of course. top notch newsmanship

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 7 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

I thought they were just like 6 white dudes. How did they ever hire over 20 people?

[–] pogt@lemmy.wtf 2 points 11 hours ago

Original USDS employees, which Musk merged into DOGE

[–] holdstrong@lemm.ee 22 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

DOGE is a restructuring of the existing US Digital Service. The people leaving are mostly people who worked there before Elon took over.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 12 points 22 hours ago

Doge is not even a real agency. As you said, it is the US digital service. The executive order Trump signed admits that Trump does not have the authority to rename an agency, and that Doge is only the "public, alternative name."

So fucking cringe.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 9 points 21 hours ago

Ignoring the people who worked there previously, Elon hired more than 6 white college kids (but the media just focused on the juniors because clicks)

[–] Devanismyname@lemmy.ca 75 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Those are the ones you want to stay. They have ethics.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 day ago

No, no, that's the point. This is a feature, not a bug.

[–] shasta@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

It's a tough decision. People are afraid of retaliation. No one wants to end up in the Nuremberg trials

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 52 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And 21 loyalists (yes, america, you're heading to monarchy) will be hired to fill those spots and nobody is left to resist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 151 points 1 day ago (26 children)

I am always confused why they don't just sabotage the efforts? Like it would be so easy and they definitely aren't paying attention...

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (7 children)

One aspect is that working in that kind of system destroys your mental health. Having to play games to hide the good things, trying to mitigate the bad things. It’s pressure.

My state has been basically been doing Project 2025 for the past five years. I had a friend in an important position in a fascist overtaken state organization who held on for a long time, fighting the good fight - but it drains. She fought her fucking hardest, but a human being can only fight for so long.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›