this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
606 points (98.7% liked)

World News

41337 readers
2277 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump has announced plans to impose 25% tariffs on the European Union, claiming the bloc was “formed to screw the United States.”

While details are pending, he suggested the levies would target cars and other imports. The EU, a major U.S. trading partner, has vowed immediate retaliation, with potential tariffs impacting $29.3 billion in exports.

French President Emmanuel Macron had attempted to dissuade Trump, urging focus on China instead.

Critics, including economists and conservative media, warn the tariffs could harm the U.S. economy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] coriza@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

Oh come on, the full USB spec may be a cluster fuck, but even the basic functionality that is shared is enough of a step forward to how it was before with multiple physical sockets with slightly different plugs and slightly different voltage and amperage. Once I forgot my phone charger at home and lo and behold I just plugged on my work laptop USB charger and now I could charge my phone. It is great. And any cable and combination like usb-a to usb-c will give you basic charging and basic data transfer. That in itself is already a saving grace and helps diminish the clutter of cables. Sure it could be better and less confusing for things like rapid charging and other stuff now USB supports but that does not detract from the advancement. Other thing, with usb-c there is also less port clutter that we had with the previously misguided plentora of USB plugs, A, B, mini, micro, etc.

[–] HappyStarDiaz@real.lemmy.fan -1 points 6 hours ago

If you have to have an hour long 15 point plan to explain why usb doesn’t suck…it sucks.

And yeah of course I would use that old moto phone 70 pin power connector over usb c. Very clear specs on what it did, and super robust.

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Now that we have established a standard we can see all the things that is wrong with it and make better for the next one, that's how you move forward

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

They're already doing that. The USB consortium released new naming schemes and labels to fix all the bizarre naming conventions.

https://www.usb.org/sites/default/files/usb_type-c_cable_logo_usage_guidelines_20240903.pdf

[–] HappyStarDiaz@real.lemmy.fan -1 points 6 hours ago

If you need a TWENTY TWO PAGE document to even start to make sense of USB…it sucks.

You’ve demonstrated quite successfully it doesn’t just suck it REALLY SUCKS

[–] coriza@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

Exactly, it is a step by step improvement.