this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
845 points (99.3% liked)

News

25461 readers
4258 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hinterlufer@lemmy.world 61 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

I find it really interesting that almost all of the recent comments on the YouTube video are 95% the same and praising "how great all this transparency" is, completely drowning out all other comments. They're also worded very very similarly.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 15 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

There is a similar phenomenon on Tiktok. The accounts often have similar name structures, have no picture or some USA flag type pic, but what gets me is that they all have around the same amount of followers or people following them.

Then people will make entire videos to engage with the bots... Drives my blood pressure up when I see it.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 12 hours ago

reddit has those types of bots too, especially on the conservative sub, half of it is by russia. and reddit touting how its getting rid of so many spammers,yet they did very little to stop the political ones, instead went after all the OF ones, and the general users too.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

I read a while ago about someone doing forensic analysis using the heuristic of analyzing follower count numbers. I forget the exact mechanism, but certain patterns indicate that the follower count was statistically anomalous and therefore likely couldn't be trusted.

[–] merdaverse@lemmy.world 19 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (3 children)

Looking at their profiles, they don't look like bots to me. Maybe it's just that MAGAs sound as stupid as a bot swarm.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 21 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

There's like a stupidly large amount of bots in YouTube comments.

Apparently they encourage engagement. 🤷

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

[–] merdaverse@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

True, the likes might be manufactured. Don't count on Google to moderate them

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 0 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

yea i noticed that too on alot of scifi channels, especially star trek, doctor who videos. almost always around wokeness.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Actually regardless of any type of video subject, really.

Any new video that I've seen, across many different subjects, has robotic comments right away, when the videos are first uploaded, the first minute or three.

I guess the YouTube folks are thinking that if it looks like there's a bunch of people "in the room" other people will want to jump in and join the conversation.

Then after that, you'll get robotic responses to your comments, that are usually antagonistic in nature, to try to bring you back to the YouTube app to reply to and continue interacting with the app.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 11 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

AI has been rapidly employed to create social media profiles. And before AI, there are entire teams dedicated to managing their own "teams" of social media profiles.

You can rest assured, like 70% of "users" on social media sites are just puppet accounts. You, as a private citizen, can rent some of these pools for things like PR campaigns.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

theres still teams doing that, in addition to the AI. Reddit is pretty wierd around ai, they use ai for thier moderation but will ban most AI used by users.(they wont do any thing around russia-troll AI accounts) but will happily ban others.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 2 points 16 hours ago

Join my new social network, SSNBook

Everyone is national-identity number verified through a third party overseen by PricewaterhouseCoopers, and we do regular video calls to vibe check you and try to sus out whether you’re posting your own thoughts or just renting out your account

Naturally only 40% of our “users” are bots

[ 👆 I think about this all time ] also for reviews etc.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

How could you tell anything by their profiles? Most had no content or other information. It's not like Reddit where you can view their comments.

[–] merdaverse@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I checked the super generic comments that seemed AI generated. Some of them had content like videos or decent descriptions. Others had profiles that were as old as 10 years. If they were bots I would expect them to be created in the last few years. There's a few that are suspicious, but it was maybe 2 in 15 accounts. They could also be hacked accounts.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 14 hours ago

I only saw one that had videos and one that had a playlist of some videos of a rightwing influencer. I wouldn't take account age to be a sign of not-bot, both because of compromised accounts as you mentioned and because YouTube botting has been going on for a long time now. It's 20 years old at this point and video monetization was introduced pretty soon after creation.

Here's their anti-bot policy page from 2014: https://web.archive.org/web/20140209083324/https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/3399767?hl=en

[–] Dimmer@leminal.space 8 points 18 hours ago

Plus 5% of how this would be worse under Harris or Biden.