this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
577 points (97.2% liked)

Funny

7970 readers
1493 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 76 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

So... how do you reduce something like people crossing a border beyond one hundred percent ?

[–] rockerface@lemm.ee 117 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

People trying to get out of the country, I guess

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I thought of this one but a deportation or just leaving aren't illegal crossings.... So it wouldn't work!

And trying to get out of the country crossing illegally is still an illegal crossing, so, it doesn't make sense

[–] Goun@lemmy.ml 56 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

They're crossing on the opposite direction now

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 1 points 8 hours ago

I also considered this one, illegally crossing in the opposite direction is still illegally crossing, so, it doesn't explain the math

[–] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 11 points 18 hours ago

And bringing additional people with them!

[–] CompassRed@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

For some reason, people will sometimes flip the fraction when calculating decreasing percentages, so this roughly means that the old number of crossings is beyond one hundred percent greater than the current number of border crossings. It's really dumb

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 1 points 8 hours ago

Ohhhhhh omg now this makes sense. Thank you!

[–] zqwzzle@lemmy.ca 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] higgsboson@dubvee.org 1 points 17 hours ago