this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
913 points (98.7% liked)

World News

45373 readers
4348 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 53 points 4 days ago (4 children)

According to the researchers, even though there are still about 4,700 tanks in storage, most of them will be difficult to restore due to their poor technical condition.

This is Russia though - "poor technical condition" is "ready for service."

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 37 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Covert Cobal has been classifying in mainly 4 categories. Abysmal is the lowest one, and are often missing such minor accessories as the turet, tracks, engines, and wheels. Not to mention having sat outdoors for upwards of 50 years. Those conditions are mostly what they're down to. It might allow for slightly higher throughout on production to start on these rusted husks rather than from raw steel, but it'd definitely be harder and more expensive to make these usable than to build a new tank from scratch.

https://youtube.com/@covertcabal

[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Devils advocate, but given the way they’ve been building metal sheds around the prior tanks and almost completely negating the main gun, a missing turret might just be a weatherproofing issue for the ~~Orks~~ Russians.

It’s not like a main gun helps you survive a mobility kill from the umpteenth TM-62 in the dirt that got replanted after the last assault failed.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is essentially where they are, improvised vehicles. They don't have the right vehicles for the job anymore, or at least not enough of them. So other vehicles are being improvised to kinda fit the desired role. There will not be a single event where you can say they are out of X vehicle class now. But what they have will be increasingly shit.

[–] torrentialgrain@lemm.ee 0 points 2 days ago

It’s not better on the Ukrainian side though.

[–] lumony@lemmings.world 0 points 2 days ago

Man, imagine if we had tanks when we were still hunter-gatherers and wild animals were a legitimate danger.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Nah, adjust for Russian standards in what "poor technical condition" even means. It's not going to Ukraine if it can't drive off the base.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 5 points 3 days ago

Nah. In those photos, where there's one or two tanks left but all the others have gone... those are immovable tanks. Couldn't even get them to the service bay. Why else would that one tank have been left behind?

[–] Yoga@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Even without assuming they'll use low quality examples, the article also says

According to researchers, only about 1,200 tanks can still be relatively easily restored after major repairs.

It sure sounds like the title is BS.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)

That is not really out of line with the title, especially if you line it up with the rest of the article. 1200 tanks that need major repairs does not mean a potential 1200 combat-ready vehicles. It means that you can, if you are really good, salvage 60% of that by cannibalizing the rest.

They drew down 350 tanks last year. Oryx confirmed 3800+ tank losses over the past 3 years, Ukraine claims 10000+. This means that they have enough tanks to last them another 6-8 months if we're being incredibly generous, if they could do 2 years of work in an instant. This is practically an empty stock.

And that doesn't count that these are the last vehicles for a reason. They are not 1200 T-72s that can be restored to full working order, it's mostly going to be very badly damaged and worn T-55s or even T-34s, compared to which an RPG-7 is space-age technology.

[–] Yoga@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I don't think "depleted stocks" is good way for saying there are tanks available but not usable but I also don't know what a better wording would be so maybe it's accurate. Thanks for elaborating regardless.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 days ago

I guess the point is that big government systems, be they healthcare or military stockpiles don't really ever dramatically reach zero. It's always a slow rot until they are incapable of serving their purpose.

The article makes the point that the Russian military stockpiles are past that point and according to what they say they seem to be.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Russia doesn’t even have anymore T34s lol. It’s mostly rusted out T72s and T62s. They made a shit ton of those.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 days ago

I think the T55 was their most produced tank.

If it was T72s, those are still good enough to be called MBTs today.