this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
320 points (98.8% liked)

196

5050 readers
1191 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

Also, when sharing art (comics etc.) please credit the creators.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Saleh@feddit.org 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Imo. relegating the decision to a properly qualified person/institution is reasonable, when you have insufficient knowledge. When it comes to matters of society as a whole of course you have a duty to acquire the knowledge and understanding, albeit that not always being easy in on itself with the way that information itself is manipulated and controlled.

[–] rockerface@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Deferring to someone else's expertise is still making a decision. It means you trust that person/institution in that matter enough to take their side, whichever that may be. Still beats sitting on the fence.

[–] aramova@infosec.pub 2 points 6 hours ago

Unless the "institution" is Fox and Friends. They can sit on a barded wire fence.

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

When I vote for someone I consider them the expert I trust to make decisions on thing I don't have knowledge of. For that reason I'm pro democracy but against (large amounts of) referendums.